Earlier quoted context omitted.
Truecrypt had this exact function - one password would decrypt your drive sort of on one end, and start the OS there, another password would decrypt the drive on the other end, and start the OS installed there - so you always had perfectly plausible deniability, since the drive taken as a whole looked like a completely normal encrypted drive(in fact you could accidentally destroy the hidden partition by overwriting "…
> perfectly plausible deniability The paranoid dystopian counterpart is that you cannot prove you don't have a second partition either. Might get awkward if someone decided to compel the second password on less solid evidence. If you're not actually using the feature.
BusKill – A USB kill cord for laptops
261–270 of 339 posts
Re: BusKill – A USB kill cord for laptops
#262Earlier quoted context omitted.
The kill switch is useless if the accused is incapacitated before they could trigger it. No knock raids, which are inherently violent, to "preserve evidence" and reduce the risk to LEO happen about 20000 times a year in the US.
> No knock raids, which are inherently violent > reduce the risk to LEO I remember reading news about an american who killed an officer who entered without knocking. He was not convicted, it was ruled self-defense.
Re: BusKill – A USB kill cord for laptops
#263Earlier quoted context omitted.
If someome is pointing a gun at you, it's probably too late to do anything. There should probably be cameras and motion detectors monitoring the perimeter in order to provide early warning.
The second part is harder to defend against. I didn't flinch when LEO pointed a loaded gun at me and threatened to shoot me, but as soon as they threatened my wife I told them I would sign whatever fiction they wanted to write, which I did. It just took me close to 8 years of being in jail to get a judge to look at it and tell them off and throw out the document.
Re: BusKill – A USB kill cord for laptops
#264Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm getting closer and closer to this reality... iphones are basically there, with icloud backup. Have been trying to get less attached to any OS installs, and be fast at building up from a fresh install. Seems hard to even trust your own desktop after a while.
Is this convenience worth sending unencrypted backups of your data to Apple? Do they allow truly offline backup and restore?
iCloud Backups are not "unencrypted backups"
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202303
I do wish they would bump the backups to "end-to-end encryption" category though, at least as an option.
Re: BusKill – A USB kill cord for laptops
#265With the T2, this still exists, but you need to wait more seconds and use a 2step combination. This is a pain because you can no longer use it to do an emergency shutdown.
Re: BusKill – A USB kill cord for laptops
#266Earlier quoted context omitted.
How will you prevent a USB device to present itself as both a keyboard and mass storage and then type commands that copy data?
With QubesOS. I just tried adding a keyboard and it simply showed me a pop up saying a USB keyboard has been attached. It won’t work until I attach it to a qube.
Re: BusKill – A USB kill cord for laptops
#267Re: BusKill – A USB kill cord for laptops
#268Good to have if you run a dark net marketplace or a political disident ring from public libraries. An additional refinement is to autolock the device if a certain personal key combo (ex. Shit - vol up - vol down) is not pressed every few minutes in response to an audible click. If not unlocked in a minute or so with a complex password, the device halts to a disk encrypted state and unpowered ram, minimizing the windo…
...and expose the contents of the screen to any camera with a good zoom? And the passwords you type? Not good.
It's just an very overpriced thing that can protect you from a thief and not the FBI.
Re: BusKill – A USB kill cord for laptops
#269This would have saved the guy running the silk road from jail
Re: BusKill – A USB kill cord for laptops
#270Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's also why Assange (and others) developed the Rubberhose file system[0]. It's based on the game theoretic idea that if your adversary has no way of knowing how many hidden partitions you have, then you have no way of proving to them that you've given them all your secrets. As such, there is no benefit to you revealing any secrets under torture, because the torture would continue even after you've told them every…
A state liable to torture you may simply kill you instead. Or torture you and kill you, even if it serves no particular purpose. If you're in the business of protecting your secrets against torture then you need to also be protecting them against death because that is grimly inevitable.