Live data from Hacker News

Obsidian – A knowledge base from a local folder of plain text Markdown files

obsidian.md

261–270 of 373 posts

Re: Obsidian – A knowledge base from a local folder of plain text Markdown files

#261
post #246

I just set this up today using self-hosted gitlab and working copy on iphone. Not friction free (since on phone you need to trigger git push/pull) but seems to be working well. Still need to get used to it, but the combination of git backed, self hosted and markdown seems pretty future proof

[deleted]

Re: Obsidian – A knowledge base from a local folder of plain text Markdown files

#262

Obsidian is great, but in a way it's quite limited as it only replaces the note-taking app / text editor I used before. We're building something similar but more capable https://acreom.com .

Constructive criticism: change the name before it's too late.

The immovable rule for good names is: they should be easy to pronounce and easy to type if you hear it from someone else.

Obsidian is a good name. Workflowy is a good name.

Acreom - I wouldn't know how to pronounce it. If someone told me "use acreom" I wouldn't know what to typo into google to find it.

Also, a non-dark theme is a must.

Re: Obsidian – A knowledge base from a local folder of plain text Markdown files

#263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They should call it Markdown* then.

Why? "Markdown" is not a standard, it's a loose collection of formats. CommonMark is a standard, and they are not calling it that. Anything that is Markdown-like can be called Markdown. It's the same deal with lisps. Lots of languages are "lisps", even the ones that are slightly different than the ones you're used to. Then there is a Common Lisp that is a language that is also a lisp.

It’s just nice to be able to differentiate between markdowns that adhere to some existing implementation (GitHub, CommonMark or something else) and those that are their own flavor.[1]

“Markdown” is marketing speak for “you probably already know this”. Which yes, sure, but all the little tiny differences between all the different implementations can act as annoying papercuts.

At least it’s not wiki markup...

[1] GitHub Markdown etc. are fine since they can be called that (X Markdown) and not just “Markdown”.

Re: Obsidian – A knowledge base from a local folder of plain text Markdown files

#264
post #259
post #81

I just downloaded deb and was a bit worried that it has 60MB, quick check on forums and it us unfortunately Electron :( Oh well, back to vim and cd.

I feel like I'm the only one mentioning vim-wiki here. But, vim-wiki?

Or its lighter-weight alternative, wiki.vim

Re: Obsidian – A knowledge base from a local folder of plain text Markdown files

#265

What I am missing most in Obsidian is this: It does not show the date created of the document. I need to hover over a note to see that info. This is such a basic and super important info, I am wondering why it‘s neglected so much. Every note taking app always shows the creation and/or modification date: Evernote, Bear, Ulysses, and every other app I know. Also the aesthetics is not on par with Bear or Ulysses. Finall…

Couldn’t you just write the date on your note?

Re: Obsidian – A knowledge base from a local folder of plain text Markdown files

#266

The CLI tool nb is excellent for taking notes in an editor of your own choice, and for making bookmarks (if readability CLI is installed it will make a local text copy of the page you're bookmarking): https://github.com/xwmx/nb It's AGPL'ed.

Wow, that is interesting. Thanks for sharing.

Re: Obsidian – A knowledge base from a local folder of plain text Markdown files

#267
post #66
post #37

The comments here made it sound exciting, but it seems like it's proprietary, which is a no-go for me. I'll stick to plain text file notes and the occasional org-mode for now.

I’d check out logseq [0]. Closer to roam than obsidian, but GPL, operates on plaintext files, and supports Org-mode style formatting as well as markdown. It’s getting to be fairly fully featured by now, and the development team moves fast. It’s a joy to use. [0]: https://logseq.com/

I've also heard of Athens [https://github.com/athensresearch/athens#athens] which is similar to Roam and can be self hosted. I haven't compared it to logseq though.

Re: Obsidian – A knowledge base from a local folder of plain text Markdown files

#268

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can sync the folder (=vault) with any tool you prefer… including git.

yes but this is not feasible on obsidian mobile app, right?

Curious, what kind of sync are you wanting for the mobile app?

Re: Obsidian – A knowledge base from a local folder of plain text Markdown files

#269
post #60

My biggest protip for Obsidian would be to never look at the connections graph. If you've got any kind of "completionist" mindset, it's easy to waste a bunch of time trying to perfectly format your notes so every node has a bunch of connections to other nodes. Once I got out of the habit trying to maximize the amount of backlinks in each note, it became a useful tool instead of a chore.

For me the act of making connections is part of the review process. The connections are really in my head. The documents are just part of the memorization and structuring. I don't spend much time on it though. Just when a subject is unclear in my mind.

The Jiggl extension gives a local network view that is actually useful and not overwhelming. You can custom style nodes by folder or tags. This makes it intuitive and worth keeping open in a frame.

Re: Obsidian – A knowledge base from a local folder of plain text Markdown files

#270

Earlier quoted context omitted.

yes but this is not feasible on obsidian mobile app, right?

Curious, what kind of sync are you wanting for the mobile app?

i am hoping, like onenote, a note taking system that i can use on computer and mobile devices and sync to each other, easily. This is very natural need.
Post reply on HN