Live data from Hacker News

Twitter's new font, Chirp, is apparently giving some users headaches

cnet.com

261–264 of 264 posts

Re: Twitter's new font, Chirp, is apparently giving some users headaches

#261
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The new font doesn't even have Arabic characters in my browser. It just gets rendered in Segoe UI. Which is fine, for what it's worth.

https://twitter.com/aaomidi/status/1425827687428415489

Wow yeah that's rough :( It's legible for me but this whole font disaster looks like a brower-by-browser minefield

Re: Twitter's new font, Chirp, is apparently giving some users headaches

#262
post #81

It's extremely similar to Roboto, which is how it was rendered for me before the change. So it seems almost like nothing happened.

The difference is quite obvious, at least on Windows. Roboto is narrower, better hinted, has fewer embellishments, got a better consistency ("rhythm") and as a result it's much easier on the eyes. Here, side by side - https://i.imgur.com/tXokROR.png - Roboto at the top, Chirp at the bottom.

Ugh yeah, very poor in that screenshot

Re: Twitter's new font, Chirp, is apparently giving some users headaches

#263
post #59

I personally can’t stand reading Twitter, but I do like posting jokes and comments for my small group of friends. I built this to delegate posting to Twitter via GitHub actions from markdown files in the repo. https://github.com/reidjs/markdown-tweet-scheduler

Why markdown? Does Twitter support rich text?

Re: Twitter's new font, Chirp, is apparently giving some users headaches

#264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But tens to even hundreds of times smaller than any single tweet that has an image in it, so not really a useful metric.

That attitude is why web pages have gotten so bloated. https://twitter.com/Twitter is 1.6mb. (200k+ of fonts, 500k+ of JS)

And heaven forbid browser caches frequently used sites, which would make that complaint an equally meaningless metric.
Post reply on HN