Live data from Hacker News

A from-scratch tour of Bitcoin in Python

karpathy.github.io

261–270 of 293 posts

Re: A from-scratch tour of Bitcoin in Python

#262

Implementing things from scratch is probably the ultimate test of thorough understanding. Chapeau! On another note I am amused that Mr. Karphathys name describes exactly what he is doing in his day job.

I don't get it. What does the word "Karpathy" mean or sound like?

Re: A from-scratch tour of Bitcoin in Python

#264
post #249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is it necessary for me to drink my own urine? No, but I do it anyway because it's sterile and I like the taste. -- Patches O'Houlihan

I am Groot -- Groot

You miss 100% of the shots you don't take

-- Wayne Gretzky -- Michael Scott

Re: A from-scratch tour of Bitcoin in Python

#265

Implementing things from scratch is probably the ultimate test of thorough understanding. Chapeau! On another note I am amused that Mr. Karphathys name describes exactly what he is doing in his day job.

I don't get it. What does the word "Karpathy" mean or sound like?

Car pathing, as in getting cars to drive along a path.

Re: A from-scratch tour of Bitcoin in Python

#266

Implementing things from scratch is probably the ultimate test of thorough understanding. Chapeau! On another note I am amused that Mr. Karphathys name describes exactly what he is doing in his day job.

I don't get it. What does the word "Karpathy" mean or sound like?

"car path ey" sounds like a thing connected to finding paths for cars.

Re: A from-scratch tour of Bitcoin in Python

#267

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't get it. What does the word "Karpathy" mean or sound like?

"car path ey" sounds like a thing connected to finding paths for cars.

D'oh. I was trying to think of a connection between "Karpathy" and Bitcoin.

Re: A from-scratch tour of Bitcoin in Python

#268
post #234
post #165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is no bitcoin needed for this at all its does not even move on the chain for the transfer. Both sides are Strike entities all this does is use bitcoin as a bridge for USD to USD which is completely pointless as both sides are USD. You could just buy USDT (or another stabelcoin) and send it there. Its a different story if there is actually a switch in currency needed. There is this famous and from bitcoin people…

Please somebody explain why it's downvoted. Ignoring digression about XRP, this is exactly what I read from the parent comment. Judging by the user-story above, all this talk about how BTC is being "sent" (which, as we all know, is a small lie on it's own, since unlike fiat, BTC is never really being sent anywhere) seems just to distract us from the fact that we just end up buying USDT for USD. No BTC involvement req…

Most of HN down votes anything about bitcoin and a few HN bitcoin fans down vote anything "negative" about bitcoin and certainly everything involving XRP. So to no surprise this is being down voted.

>No BTC involvement required.

Totally correct. Remittance over a bridge currency only make sense under very specific conditions, which include that the input currency and the output currency are different. And a direct exchange is not possible or not cheap.

The traditional banking system does this as well, they usually use USD as bridge. To pair every currency with every currency simply isn't feasible and the low volume pairs would have no liquidity anyway. Its basically the same as with goods if you have wood but want metal you use a currency as bridge because there is no market to sell wood for metal. Now if you also have a location difference between the market where you want to sell and the mark where you want to buy then you actually can use the bridge currency to move from one market (location) to another market (location).

Re: A from-scratch tour of Bitcoin in Python

#270
post #40
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Bitcoin does not expose your public key until you spend from it. Are you sure, what about when someone sends to it?

They're correct. The blockchain just records that the funds were sent to your address. To spend the funds you have to show the public key which hashes to that address, in another transaction signed by the private key. If the sender wanted to send you a private message, they would need your public key, but that's not what transactions do.

Fair enough, thank you.
Post reply on HN