Live data from Hacker News

I quit my job to focus on SerenityOS full time

awesomekling.github.io

261–264 of 264 posts

Re: I quit my job to focus on SerenityOS full time

#261
post #229
post #216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

you cannot be more correct. too many elite programmers are not only jerks, but also selfish egoistic masochists who deny any right to others to be wrong now and then, while still fit for work. yet - same jerks often complain having difficulties finding help (typically overseeing the quite obvious reason for it). no, this is not a hate comment, but a sad one, as rarely people ask why so many opensource projects are le…

I think you're onto something about showing off. You just won't hear as much relative to their importance about the projects led by entirely uncontroversial people who don't care about attention. Another aspect is that in a lot of disciplines, a certain level of maniacal persistence increases your chance of success. To take the "mythical" 10k hours to mastery, it's a lot easier to get to 10k hours if you're not spend…

what i also tried to say, but maybe could not do so well... is that opensource is not about being open to people or acting democratic. surely there are many nice ppl behind opensource projects, but that does not make these projects inclusive.

also there is great number of great people that are very great at coding and not so great at communicating with other people.

so what is emphasized here in my comment is that the kind of opensource project that is inclusive and led by s.o. who knows how to express empathy and has time to also be involved with other people is more valuable as a community effort.

not going into discussion whether openssl is better of with one single dev or not, whether sqlite3 is more important than a serenityos etc.

Re: I quit my job to focus on SerenityOS full time

#262
post #214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting. To each his own, of course - but in this one particular video, the print-debugging he does, might have been quicker and easier in a debugger (or perhaps with a core dump?). Then again, maybe not in c++. I admit, I work mostly with ruby these days, which of course has a quite decent repl and debug experience (still whish it had full smalltalk style crash(missing method) > debugger > fix/add method > resum…

I'm used to fix and understand issues in big C++ codebases, and while eventually use a debugger, i feel that printing while passing is much better because you can see the bigger picture. Is like putting a bell in each step so when the running bunny passes over it rings. Later you see every place the bunny passes over and what it did, i feel its much faster to grasp and understand whats happening. Debugging feels very…

That's somewhat true, it changes to me when rr works and so you can basically do print where you want and going back if you forgot something.

Re: I quit my job to focus on SerenityOS full time

#263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's always Arch Linux ARM, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD and RiscOS. They all run on a Raspberry Pi 4. What are you looking for that those aren't covering?

Some among the cheaper boards are much less capable than the RPi4; 256 or 512 MB RAM can indeed run a tiny Linux desktop, but for some uses it would struggle for lack of resources. A single user system with no layers of code devoted to security (which would be pointless in non connected devices) would probably be a lot faster on constricted hardware. The goal of such a system shouldn't be to replace BSD or Linux, whi…

Speaking of "cheaper boards" :

http://collapseos.org/

I'm somewhat skeptical of the usefulness of 16 and 32 bit software : 8-bit is simple and can do ASCII, sRGB... while 64-bit is enough for the foreseeable future, but in-between ? You're just hampering yourself for dubious gains...

Re: I quit my job to focus on SerenityOS full time

#264
post #162

Does it run on 386SX with 2MB of RAM? Apart from lack of coo-processor (which I understand), I do not understand why nearly ALL modern operating systems(Including Linux since 2.4 I believe) are hard-coding the kernel to not boot under 4/8 MB of RAM, even if it could in theory. Why there is hard-limit of 4, 8, 64 MB of RAM in many kernels of various operating systems? Is it fail safe "just to be safe" or because there…

64KB of memory should be enough for anyone :

http://collapseos.org/hardware.html

Post reply on HN