Live data from Hacker News

Signal Adds Cryptocurrency Support

schneier.com

261–263 of 263 posts

Re: Signal Adds Cryptocurrency Support

#261
post #242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm actually going to go out on a limb and defend their choice of MobileCoin. Signal has always been a decent privacy/convenience tradeoff and MobileCoin is no different. Features like phone numbers and contact uploading were always a user friendly tradeoff. They also seem to trust SGX. Monero's isn't slow by any means but isn't fast either. UI changes can alleviate the issue but being unable to spend your entire bal…

They could've created a federated SGX-based model on top of any of the existing cryptocurrencies. The only reason for them to invent a new one is making $$$.

How so? When I consider how to build it on top of an existing smart contact platform you'd have to have a whole extra, nonstandard layer for key rotation and you'd miss out on privacy guarentees. If we assume their goal of privacy and sub 10s finality I can't see how they could have done it on an existing cryptocurrency.

What they've done is essentially take Monero as a base, remove mining and use Stellar Consensus then solve any new privacy issues that arise.

Re: Signal Adds Cryptocurrency Support

#263
post #211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Monero or ZCash would have gotten the job done, Those cryptocurrencies have a large energy consumption. I assume that part of the reason to go with MobileCoin is because it's less power hungry.

You only increase the energy consumption of a crypto if you put many transactions on it (via increasing demand on the coin, and hence the price), so it doesn't really matter whether you use an existing PoW coin or a new one.

> it doesn't really matter whether you use an existing PoW coin or a new one.

MobileCoin isn't a PoW coin.

Post reply on HN