Live data from Hacker News

Germany pauses AstraZeneca vaccinations as a 'precaution'

reuters.com

261–270 of 572 posts

Re: Germany pauses AstraZeneca vaccinations as a 'precaution'

#261

with ~300 deaths per day in germany, how many people will this kill?

Maybe many immediately. However, getting bad press for vaccines and the government not doing enough to prevent "unnecessary" death could decrease the voluntary vaccination rate significantly. That would bring much more problems in the long term. Of course, you can only guess what would happen, they want to play the safe game, medicine in general is not a friend with risk.

Re: Germany pauses AstraZeneca vaccinations as a 'precaution'

#262
post #190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm set to take the oxford d vaccine, but I could also take the pfizer vaccine. I've had elevated blood markers for clotting during covid-19, and now I hear of this. I'm thinking of taking 75 mg aspirin, before and after the vaccine. On the other hand, the issue is the patients have low platelet count and I understand that this is the way aspirin reduces blod clotting. So, do these patients have low platelet count be…

Talk to your doctor before making decisions. Taking aspirin right before a vaccine might not be a good idea as it can blunt your immune system response, but the whole point of a vaccine is to elicit a strong immune response that builds memory. I know acetaminophen is specifically mentioned as something not to take right before the COVID-19 vaccines (and afterwards, if you can deal with the immune response naturally).

I'm not a doctor but I can tell you what they will say and save op $200 for a useless visit. Doctor will mention there's no data and does not recommend it.

Re: Germany pauses AstraZeneca vaccinations as a 'precaution'

#263

You do have to wonder if some of this is politically driven. Germany are losing hundreds of life's a day, while in the meantime the UK has administrated 23 million doses (not sure the ratio of those that were AstraZeneca) and not recorded a single fatality or adverse reaction and are seeing infection rates / deaths drop. I can understand caution under normal circumstances, but nothing is normal right now.

Well, there is also this:

https://www.theverge.com/2021/3/7/22318113/russia-intelligen...

Re: Germany pauses AstraZeneca vaccinations as a 'precaution'

#264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The anti-vax groups have been eating this up since before it was even related to the AZ vaccination. There were posts about medical professionals in the US who received the Pfizer vaccine having similar issues shortly after having that injection.

Those cases actually happened (they've been reported by reputable sources, not anti-vaxxers blogs), but nobody cared because the numbers are small. It's definitely weird to see countries reacting when this happens with AZ.

Sure those cases happened. Of course in a country of 300 million people strange stuff happens every day.

What is more likely, that two independently developed and tested vaccines using a different technique both have the same rare side effect or that these things happen at a low level in the population and are completely uncorrelated with the vaccine?

Re: Germany pauses AstraZeneca vaccinations as a 'precaution'

#265
post #248

Let’s see if any new data comes out, but from what’s public right now I can only see this pause costing many lives across Europe. We’ve had millions of doses in the UK without serious side effects, so unless there were faulty batches I think any risk must be minuscule, and certainly lower than the known risks of covid deaths for unvaccinated people. This is a case where a cautious ‘first do no harm’ approach will lik…

These cases are 4x greater then the ones in the UK, so either UK isn't reporting some cases, or something isn't right with AZ production.

Also, I'm pretty sure each regulator knows the pros and cons of this decision, and they know well the consequences of stopping the vaccination - it's not like they are all incompetent. I mean, imagine the odds of the amount of ignorance to have reached this level of decision making in several independent countries.

Not likely, at all.

It's not a "a case where a cautious ‘first do no harm’ approach will likely cost many lives.", it's them doing their job and follow the procedure that has worked pretty well, based in science. It's what builds trust in vaccines and medicines, knowing that regulators are there, aware, and if they think something is wrong they won't take a stupid risk out of pride or pressure.

Re: Germany pauses AstraZeneca vaccinations as a 'precaution'

#266

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Surely more people will die from COVID than from blood clotting, due to this delay? Or perhaps not, given that 2020 deaths in Germany were 985,145, only 4.85% higher than 2019, and only 3.2% higher than 2018 (and so basically in line with what we would expect from an aging society). https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoel...

You're missing the point. This is an anomaly. It's not about the "oh it's worth the risk compared to COVID 19". If it's a side effect it wasn't spotted in the trials, why was that? It's not a side effect? It was a problem in production? What problem? Was is tampered with or was an accident? What failed in QA to let that batch come to the public? Was is a storage problem that compromised the batch quality? Was it whil…

And those last couple of sentences are really, really important: If forging ahead despite the blood clotting causes folks to lose trust in vaccines, it could be worse than Covid has. And realistically, we don't need more folks to be anti-vaccine.

Re: Germany pauses AstraZeneca vaccinations as a 'precaution'

#267
post #197
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The ethical issue is that the people dying from COVID and the people who might have an adverse reaction from the vaccination are not the same people. If mostly old people die from COVID but the adverse reaction of the vaccine is independent of age, then for very young people the risk of an adverse reaction of the vaccination might outweigh the risk of permanent damage from COVID.

Yeah. As someone not in any risk group I will prefer the Pfizer or Moderna one. I'll be happy to get the Janssen one or even the Sputnik, but if the vaccine they offer me is AZ then I will refuse. And not just because of the obviously higher risk associated, but also because it appears not to be effective against the new strains. (Especially the new South Africa strain). Unlike for example the Janssen vaccine (goes b…

Sputnik is not approved, manufacturers are cooperating for all the other vaccines already.

Regarding the strains, all vaccines are less effective against the South African one.

Re: Germany pauses AstraZeneca vaccinations as a 'precaution'

#268

Maybe AZ should have charged €3 per shot instead of €2 and spent the extra € on a PR agency. They just seem to be constantly taking a hammering in the press, unfairly I’d say.

It was totally deserved, the EU helped fund the vaccine with a €336 million grant and what they did was stopping the exports from the UK plants to the EU while still exporting from the EU to the UK.No wonder that they didn't delivered the promised doses since their best efforts were being allocated to the UK.

Re: Germany pauses AstraZeneca vaccinations as a 'precaution'

#269
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A problem with bureaucracies is that they often care deeply if people die from an action they are responsible for, but are fine if there are massive deaths due to inaction.

The solution is simple though: politicians simply ask experts how many people die if they do X versus Y, and make sure it is recorded (e.g. by journalists) so they can refer to it later.

Now as a politician, you just need to find the right expert that will recommend you whatever you want to do.

Re: Germany pauses AstraZeneca vaccinations as a 'precaution'

#270

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hope not, but those can be famous last words. Even if AZ works as marketed, it's no where near 100%. Then we have different strains

Nothing is going to ever be 100% safe. Live your life how you want, but I'm personally fine with a little risk and live a more fulfilling life with more life experiences. I ride a motorcycle. It's defiantly not safe, but I've had so many great memories on it that I am fine with the risk.

Plenty of motorcyclists forget to keep the rubber side down, get hurt, then continue riding after recuperating from injuries.

Still, the consequences for those unfortunate riders can stay with them throughout life.

Ride safe.

Post reply on HN