Live data from Hacker News

Apple’s longtime supplier accused of using forced labor in China

washingtonpost.com

261–270 of 820 posts

Re: Apple’s longtime supplier accused of using forced labor in China

#261

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would you consider only buying a used/refurbished phone/computer? Obviously it’s not scalable to the masses, but not putting any money in Apple’s pocket directly

I only buy used phones. But I rarely buy used computers / monitors. Those are my bread and butter, so reliability matters.

Yea understandable, I’ve had great experiences with refurbished MacBooks for what it’s worth

Re: Apple’s longtime supplier accused of using forced labor in China

#262

All the hand-wringing and pedantry in this thread, just to defend China and Apple.

How did you decide that? HN has always been pedantry, many actual questions are valid even if they discuss semantics or validity of the sources. It is the way HN always has been

Re: Apple’s longtime supplier accused of using forced labor in China

#263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are kept in camps, monitored constantly, have no privacy, are searched constantly and on top of that, they are forced to work or go to detention. That is slavery. There's also the problem with them getting gutted for the organ transplants that China's own doctors have reported to be 4 times higher than they should be for the population size. So it is work, or go to detention and possibly get gutted.

What sources are you getting the organ transplants information from?

Speculation from multiple sources: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyZschwFN-c&ab_channel=SkyNe...

Extrapolation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organ_harvesting_from_Falun_Go...

Re: Apple’s longtime supplier accused of using forced labor in China

#264

I'm amazed the world isn't taking more action on China. Its quite sad really, 20 years ago, any one of the headlines from this year would have prompted sanctions and denunciations...

> I'm amazed the world isn't taking more action on China. Its quite sad really, 20 years ago, any one of the headlines from this year would have prompted sanctions and denunciations... I don't think so. Nothing happened with Tibet, or after the Tiananmen Square event AFAIK. 20 years ago, the people that signed all the trade deals with countries such as China claimed it would lead to improving democracy and human righ…

> obviously, it didn't

Of course it did, in Kishore Mahbuani's words:

>The greatest explosion of personal freedoms that the Chinese people have experienced in the past 4,000 years has taken place in the last 40 years

There's some slide back in some categories from Hu Jintao era, but overall things are progressing. The west fixates on the 1% of extra bad when it's been mostly great.

>what human cost?

800m uplifted from poverty, a few million minorities gets shafted, to be crass: the cost was/is negligible all things considered. Post 90s China bad, but mostly good. Overwhelming good compared to others with similar starting positions and much better development conditions, i.e. China had some of the most onerous WTO accession protocols and sanctions that held back her development.

Re: Apple’s longtime supplier accused of using forced labor in China

#265

I'm amazed the world isn't taking more action on China. Its quite sad really, 20 years ago, any one of the headlines from this year would have prompted sanctions and denunciations...

Are you also amazed the world didn't take action against the US under Trump?

Re: Apple’s longtime supplier accused of using forced labor in China

#266
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Equating slavery with forced labour belittles the gravity and awfulness of what actual slavery is (or was). Forced labour takes different forms, which includes forced paid work and by some definitions penal work. Slavery is when a person is treated as a property of another person. Being a slave may or may not involve forced labour. In addition, calling Uyghur work “slavery” in fact undermines the cause, allowing CCP…

They are kept in camps, monitored constantly, have no privacy, are searched constantly and on top of that, they are forced to work or go to detention. That is slavery. There's also the problem with them getting gutted for the organ transplants that China's own doctors have reported to be 4 times higher than they should be for the population size. So it is work, or go to detention and possibly get gutted.

> They are kept in camps, monitored constantly, have no privacy, are searched constantly and on top of that, they are forced to work or go to detention

This also seems to describe prison labor that occurs in the US, which, putting problems and criticisms aside, is definitely different from slavery. I don't think the imprecision in language is helpful, it hurts the cause in the same way people constantly referring to modern political leaders as literal Nazis hurts their credibility.

Re: Apple’s longtime supplier accused of using forced labor in China

#267

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are kept in camps, monitored constantly, have no privacy, are searched constantly and on top of that, they are forced to work or go to detention. That is slavery. There's also the problem with them getting gutted for the organ transplants that China's own doctors have reported to be 4 times higher than they should be for the population size. So it is work, or go to detention and possibly get gutted.

What sources are you getting the organ transplants information from?

I often hear that uyghurs organs are sold as pure/halal organs to muslims from Saudi Arabia (and other rich muslims countries). If it is true -- and I think it is -- that is indeed absolutly abominable.

https://www.saveuighur.org/the-economics-of-chinas-organ-har...

https://theircc.org/organharvesting/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organ_harvesting_from_Falun_Go...

Re: Apple’s longtime supplier accused of using forced labor in China

#268
post #9

"forced labor" It's slavery...modern day slavery. Why are we mincing words? We stand on our soap boxes and preach about historical injustices and how we need to repair them. Well here is your chance to prevent a future historical injustice, and all it takes is for you to take a stand, instead of quietly consuming the products and leaving it for future generations to atone for methods by which those products were prod…

"Modern day slavery" is mincing words, slavery in the modern day is just slavery. Typically slavery refers to the slave being considered property, and ownership transferring to offspring. You can compare it to forced labor.

"Slavery" etymology takes its roots with the "Slavs" people, who were, well, enslaved in medieval times. The term has been commonly accepted to describe various similar patterns before and after those times.

I agree that yesterday or today slavery is just slavery, whatever subtile differences there might be.

Re: Apple’s longtime supplier accused of using forced labor in China

#269
post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple fans don’t seem to care, as long as they are getting their magic, nothing else matters...

Eh, nobody, including yourself, maybe except the Jainists, are willing to do without the creature comforts of their lifestyle, not just Apple users. Look at all the things you own and use, some of them built in the same Foxconn factory no doubt. We can look the squalor of factory-farmed animals right in the eye while biting into our ham sandwich and say "damn, someone should really do something about that." Or, perha…

Don't you need some kind of a cultural awakening to force politicians to introduce legislation?

Re: Apple’s longtime supplier accused of using forced labor in China

#270
I’ve minimized my consumption of meat over the years, because the way we treat animals in the factory farms is too cruel.

It’s not perfect, because I eat dairy and eggs which introduce their own set of cruelty.

Likewise, I’m severely disappointed by Apple. I’ve switched from Android to iPhone because I like Apple’s stance on privacy.

I’m extremely bothered that Apple with its resource is not lobbying to change the playing field and make it expensive to use slave labor.

I get that they cannot do it today, but what excuse is there to not play the long game?

Post reply on HN