Live data from Hacker News

How satellite ‘megaconstellations’ will photobomb astronomy images

nature.com

261–270 of 395 posts

Re: How satellite ‘megaconstellations’ will photobomb astronomy images

#261
post #226
post #207

Earlier quoted context omitted.

how many space-based telescopes are there? And how many will where be, once 9/10 launches fail?

> And how many will where be, once 9/10 launches fail? This is not a real thing that will happen.

This was never meant to be a real thing, but I fantasized. Some people then told me that our some dozen space telescopes are sooo much better.

How do you know by the way that this will never happen?

Re: How satellite ‘megaconstellations’ will photobomb astronomy images

#262
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I personally believe that pervasive high speed internet even in remote locations will do more for humanity than the scientific cost of these satellites. However, this conversation has basically been skipped over. Maybe you're right and I'm wrong. The constellations are being launched, and there's zero chance of shutting them down once they're serving a commercial role. Considering the abundant red tape in the modern…

> I personally believe that pervasive high speed internet even in remote locations will do more for humanity than the scientific cost of these satellites. I've had faster Internet than the average Starlink speedtest says, in rural Romania, at the foot of a mountain, wild bears and all: https://twitter.com/q3k/status/1172621386977861632 . Internet access in rural areas is pretty much a solved problem, it just now hing…

I wonder if all the people without internet will join the discussion? Oh .... wait ....

Re: How satellite ‘megaconstellations’ will photobomb astronomy images

#263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I was picturing some of the places I've been in Africa that don't have mobile reception and may well never get it if it means laying fiber. When was the last time that you were in Africa? And in which country, because it's an entire continent. EDIT: So I guess HN doesn't like being called out on https://africasacountry.com/ issues? Well sorry not sorry, but as someone born in Ghana I'm more a little tired of the se…

This isn't about being able to afford infrastructure. It's about population density in rural areas. North America and Australia (where I'm from) have the exact same issue. No country is going to spend a million bucks to lay fiber to ten person towns in the middle of nowhere.

And yet you used Africa as an example, instead of North America and Australia. Why?

EDIT: Wow, you guys are really bad at admitting your own blatantly obvious biases, aren't you?

Re: How satellite ‘megaconstellations’ will photobomb astronomy images

#264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The readout time for astronomy CCDs is typically between 2 and 30s (going faster produces more noise), so there is a lower limit on how short you can make exposures. In LEO the apparent movement of satellites is around 3.6 arcmin per second, which means for an average sized detector that covers maybe 20 arcmin it takes about 6s to produce a streak that covers the full length of the detector (bit longer depending on t…

I'm not sure you're thinking about it the right way. Or maybe I'm not. It seems you're assuming that every exposure you take will have a streak in the same spot from a satellite. It's more realistic that a large portion of exposures will have no streak at all, or that if you re-exposed a detector on the same piece of sky, any streak it would see the second time would be in a different place than the first. So if you…

The piece that people are missing is the concept of SNR, or signal-to-noise ratio. These streaks are noise, which raises your noise floor and thus raises your detection threshold. Think of the way your eyes adjust to bright light - you can no longer see dim things around it even if they aren't obscured.

Re: How satellite ‘megaconstellations’ will photobomb astronomy images

#265

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I was picturing some of the places I've been in Africa that don't have mobile reception and may well never get it if it means laying fiber. When was the last time that you were in Africa? And in which country, because it's an entire continent. EDIT: So I guess HN doesn't like being called out on https://africasacountry.com/ issues? Well sorry not sorry, but as someone born in Ghana I'm more a little tired of the se…

This isn't about being able to afford infrastructure. It's about population density in rural areas. North America and Australia (where I'm from) have the exact same issue. No country is going to spend a million bucks to lay fiber to ten person towns in the middle of nowhere.

>> No country is going to spend a million bucks to lay fiber to ten person towns in the middle of nowhere.

Why not? It has been done before. Every developed country went through a period of rural electrification whereby schemes were developed to encourage and/or force electric companies to run wires out into the rural farmland. Internet is the modern analogue for electrification. Those same approaches would work equally well for fiber.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rural_electrification

The American approach: "The Rural Electrification Administration (REA) was created by executive order as an independent federal bureau in 1935, authorized by the United States Congress in the 1936 Rural Electrification Act, and later in 1939, reorganized as a division of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. It was charged with administering loan programs for electrification and telephone service in rural areas. Between 1935 and 1939 – or the first 4½ years after REA's establishment, the number of farms using electric services more than doubled"

Re: How satellite ‘megaconstellations’ will photobomb astronomy images

#266
post #17

How long are digital exposures? It seems like most of the interference could be removed with a bit of signal processing.

A deep image will typically consist of many 20-minute exposures. You can't have the exposure be too short because the CCD read-out process introduces noise, so you want as few read-outs as possible. But if the image is exposed for too long parts of it may saturate and start to ruin the rest of the image. (Plus you may have the whole thing ruined by a cosmic ray or a satellite or something.) Something around twenty minutes is generally the sweet spot.

Throwing out an image or two that had a satellite or cosmic ray pass through out of a few dozen isn't so bad. But if every single one of the images has a satellite trail you may be out of luck.

Re: How satellite ‘megaconstellations’ will photobomb astronomy images

#267

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I personally believe that pervasive high speed internet even in remote locations will do more for humanity than the scientific cost of these satellites. However, this conversation has basically been skipped over. Maybe you're right and I'm wrong. The constellations are being launched, and there's zero chance of shutting them down once they're serving a commercial role. Considering the abundant red tape in the modern…

My grandmother's only option of internet in an european city is 8mb down, 2mb up.

If it was dirt cheap, I'd probably jump at it. My Netflix streams the usual pablum using about 5% of the 50mb/s fibre at my house. As for phone plans, electricity and other near "utilities" it doesn't do the vendor any good if consumers actually understand their own needs. And don't get me started on megapixels!

Re: How satellite ‘megaconstellations’ will photobomb astronomy images

#268
So the next logical step is to move astronomy into space. I mean all the astronomy, including an amateur astronomy. Elon Musk should launch 100k telescopes into orbit (somewhat higher than constellations of satellites), so I could pay $100/year to rent one, to write a program controlling telescope taking pictures and sending them to me.

Re: How satellite ‘megaconstellations’ will photobomb astronomy images

#269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My grandmother's only option of internet in an european city is 8mb down, 2mb up.

If it was dirt cheap, I'd probably jump at it. My Netflix streams the usual pablum using about 5% of the 50mb/s fibre at my house. As for phone plans, electricity and other near "utilities" it doesn't do the vendor any good if consumers actually understand their own needs. And don't get me started on megapixels!

Of course it's way too expensive. Around the price of Starlink access.

Re: How satellite ‘megaconstellations’ will photobomb astronomy images

#270

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't the solution more satellites for astronomy? In fact, couldn't the constellation of commercial satellites be used to make a massive distributed hubble telescope?

Will those american billionaires pay say for more European satellites to compensate? What if this were Chinese satellites would you have the same opinion? It would be great if this billionaires would also launch scientific satellites payed from their pocket to compensate, then I would change my mind.

> It would be great if this billionaires would also launch scientific satellites payed from their pocket to compensate, then I would change my mind.

They don't owe you anything.

Post reply on HN