Small suggestion -- it seems like you're using the wrong units (or maybe abbreviations) for your displayed average page sizes. You're using lower-case b to indicate bits, but I suspect you mean upper-case B to indicate bytes? Also, the lower-case k is the correct prefix for 1,000, but lower case m is milli, or 1/000. You want M for mega, which is 1,000,000. Also if you really want to be precise you should consider wh…
This is a hilarious nit-pick. In the context of an internet blog describing average page-size, it's completely obvious that mb == MB ... not millibars... There's an insane amount of abbreviations and acronyms that have multiple meanings in different contexts. How many Wikipedia pages have [disambiguation] here ?...
Show HN: Bear – Minimal blogging platform
261–270 of 358 posts
Re: Show HN: Bear – Minimal blogging platform
#262Things I would like in a blogging platform: * Generate lightweight static website * Good clean default CSS so I don't have to mess with it * Automatically upload website to CDN and trigger expirations as necessary. * Self-hosted * Runs on AWS Lambda or any other Function as a Service equivilient * Has a super lightweight CMS that I can easily use on both desktop and mobile, so if I have ideas I can start writing anyw…
Quick Question: Why is self-hosted a thing that's highly desirable on HN?
With self hosting I can control the code, what it does, the cost, where it stores data, how backups are made, etc.
It’s always a trade off on control, and my comfort point is “on AWS”.
For some people they want their own servers. Some people want to own the network block. It’s just what level of comfort you have with each type of control.
Re: Show HN: Bear – Minimal blogging platform
#263Medium ~4mb
Blogger ~1mb
Wordpress ~4mb
Ghost ~3mb
Bear ~5kb (yep)"
There is definitely something to be said with respect to how bloaty many blogging packages are these days...
Actually, come to think of it, that would be a great name for a new blogging service... call it "bloaty" or "bloatly" or something like that....
It could also refer to the fact that with most blogs, the signal to noise ratio of the words comprising the articles is similarly bloated, as well... so "bloatly" would be a great name! That'll be my next Y Combinator submission for summer 2020!
"Bloatly"!
I can picture my future company's Y Combinator interview:
YC Staff: "So what does your piece of software do?"
Us: "It's a blogging platform, the very first HAAS (Hot-Air-As-a-Service) platform out there... Great for politicians and salespeople! 1.21 Gigabytes of useless JavaScript per page... the Internet will end before you successfully download any page!"
YC: "So what do you call it?"
Us: "We call it Bloatly -- now give us our $150,000 check!"
(Kidding, obviously! )
Re: Show HN: Bear – Minimal blogging platform
#264Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quick Question: Why is self-hosted a thing that's highly desirable on HN?
Control. With self hosting I can control the code, what it does, the cost, where it stores data, how backups are made, etc. It’s always a trade off on control, and my comfort point is “on AWS”. For some people they want their own servers. Some people want to own the network block. It’s just what level of comfort you have with each type of control.
Re: Show HN: Bear – Minimal blogging platform
#265Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've been aware of these for around 20 years, I've not seen that nomenclature growing in popularity. It doesn't help that it just sounds silly to my ears.
Nail on the head. They're just weird, at least in the context of English phonetics. That's the reason I discourage their adoption. I'd much rather we just all agree that kilobyte means 2^10 bytes. Or find words that aren't weird. If I remember correctly, a big motivation for this change was the fact that disk manufacturers intentionally used base-10 definitions so they could advertise larger numbers for disk capacity…
Re: Show HN: Bear – Minimal blogging platform
#266Re: Show HN: Bear – Minimal blogging platform
#267“Bear” is a well-known note-taking and writing app https://bear.app/
Re: Show HN: Bear – Minimal blogging platform
#268Earlier quoted context omitted.
What I want is a Yahoo-style directory for blogs. Blog owners can put their blog in exactly one category. Users can star the blogs they like, similar to GitHub, and identify the low quality click generators/marketing blogs. I personally find Medium to be a horrible way to find content. Maybe it works for new content, if that's what you're after.
The success of search engines prompted Yahoo to ditch its original product (the curation and categorization of the web) in favor of its competitors automated (and thereby game-able) crawl-index-search approaches. Now, decades later, there seems to be a shared yearning for the curated web, perhaps in response to the low signal:noise ratio of search. Isn't it funny, how the world works in cycles? Curated search (domain…
Re: Show HN: Bear – Minimal blogging platform
#269Things I would like in a blogging platform: * Generate lightweight static website * Good clean default CSS so I don't have to mess with it * Automatically upload website to CDN and trigger expirations as necessary. * Self-hosted * Runs on AWS Lambda or any other Function as a Service equivilient * Has a super lightweight CMS that I can easily use on both desktop and mobile, so if I have ideas I can start writing anyw…
People think a static site is enough without realizing SEO, RSS feeds, comments, etc, are all things you might need and would have to rebuild yourself.
Re: Show HN: Bear – Minimal blogging platform
#270Earlier quoted context omitted.
Write on your phone, commit to git, have some CI build it and deploy. Simples :)
> Write on your phone, Ok that part's easy. > commit to git How? I've never seen a good git client for the phone > have some CI build it and deploy. Step one, draw a circle. Step two, draw the rest of the owl. :) While this might be a fun exercise, it's more involved than deploying some code to Lambda.
That coupled with Working Copy could be a pretty good mobile workflow.
For me, this was much easier than deploying Lambda code and managing How all of that worked together. Using Github Actions wasn’t much more than setting up a deploy script.