Buttplug: An open-source software suite for teledildonics
261–265 of 265 posts
Re: Buttplug: An open-source software suite for teledildonics
#262Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hah yessss email me! In 2013 I switched from sex toys to Flutter Wireless (based on the wireless remote from the sex toy) and my kickstarter for Flutter met its funding goal. Six years of continuous burnout ensued. [1] Now I’m largely recovered and working half time to allow for open source development like my off road robot. [2] Hope you’ve been well and looking forward to catching up more. :) [1] https://youtu.be/h…
Wow the off-road rover is spectacular. My old roommate and I built one years ago, but out of hope, dreams, kapton tape and an iPhone running Skype ( https://twitter.com/martinmroz/status/518511940675440640?s=2... ).
Re: Buttplug: An open-source software suite for teledildonics
#263Hey nice project. You may want to consider changing domains though "No .IO domain may be used, directly or indirectly, for any purpose that is sexual or pornographic" https://www.nic.io/rules.htm
Porntoken.io has been up for several years with no problems. Also porntoken was the first project to do teledildonics with the lovense toys through the Ethereum blockchain. https://github.com/porntoken/EthereumDildoMonitor We had a live model at the late Dennis Hoffs cathouse near Reno with a lovense in her vajayjay taking ETH porntoken ICO investments in her toy through the ethereum blockchain. Porntoken is largely…
Re: Buttplug: An open-source software suite for teledildonics
#264Re: Buttplug: An open-source software suite for teledildonics
#265Hi! Buttplug Project Lead here! AMA!
I have one more line of questions. I have, um, observed that "cam" sex workers use teledildonics as a kind of "proof of life". The idea is that paying customers send signals to a sex toy in use by the performer, whose reaction reassures the customer that he is paying for a live show. It affords a way of (apparently) "doing stuff" to the performer in spite of the virtualized nature of the show. Two part question: 1. A…
I mean, if the tech reaches such heights that a customer can't tell it from a human, does it even matter for the customer?
(Actually I think that on an emotional level it does, but realistically it's a question of inputs to the brain, i.e. the whole Matrix mind-body thing. Anyway, I'm sure this is firmly in the AGI territory.)