Earlier quoted context omitted.
So how would the US government force Insorg, which is Russian, to log?
which is Russian That's a bit like moving from Phoenix to Pyongyang to escape the unconscionable oppression of your local HOA.
VPN – Very Precarious Narrative
261–270 of 281 posts
Re: VPN – Very Precarious Narrative
#262Damn. I don't even know where to begin. It's true that VPN services at best provide less anonymity than Tor does. And that some, such as HideMyAss (which pwned that LulzSec dude) provide none. But PIA clearly does, as demonstrated now in two criminal investigations.[0] Of course, in both cases, defendants pwned themselves through poor OPSEC. But at least PIA didn't give them up. And the Facebook example. Nobody payin…
If we talking OPSEC, PIA of out, as any other with your payment info. You'll need to have few different anonymous VPNs and self hosted VPNs/proxies to make random chains. Pay by coins only, throwaway emails.
No VPN service has my "payment info". Or at least, not any meaningful payment info. As you say, I use email accounts created through Tor, and pay with Bitcoin that's been mixed at least three times through Tor, using a different Whonix instance and a different mixer for each mix.
Re: VPN – Very Precarious Narrative
#263Earlier quoted context omitted.
which is Russian That's a bit like moving from Phoenix to Pyongyang to escape the unconscionable oppression of your local HOA.
Yeah, but why would Russia care about me?
We've actually seen this in action throughout the West, including but not limited to the US, recently, so it's not merely a theoretical concern. We are no longer in a world where you need to be personally important to be a target of foreign nation-state information gathering and targeting, because the same factors that make that scale for private actors and your home government make it scale for foreign governments that may potentially be opposed to or wish to influence your home government.
Re: VPN – Very Precarious Narrative
#264Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Possible options include Tor I thought most folks believe that the NSA/CIA/some other TLA has control of more than 50% of the exit nodes, which should be enough to reconstruct the sources of most traffic.
It seems rival agencies (Chinese, Russian) should be interested in doing the same, or at least denying NSA this capability. I mean adding some exit nodes is not exactly expensive, seems like a low hanging fruit, doesn’t it?
And it's no accident. Tor was designed that way.
Re: VPN – Very Precarious Narrative
#265Damn. I don't even know where to begin. It's true that VPN services at best provide less anonymity than Tor does. And that some, such as HideMyAss (which pwned that LulzSec dude) provide none. But PIA clearly does, as demonstrated now in two criminal investigations.[0] Of course, in both cases, defendants pwned themselves through poor OPSEC. But at least PIA didn't give them up. And the Facebook example. Nobody payin…
> And the Facebook example. Nobody paying attention expects a VPN service (or even Tor) to hide their identity if they login using their real name. That's just stupid. A lot of users care about privacy, but have no idea how computer networking works. It's hard for these users to understand whether they're private or not. If you don't believe me, check out the tech support and recommendations over at old.reddit.com/r/…
Re: VPN – Very Precarious Narrative
#266Earlier quoted context omitted.
which is Russian That's a bit like moving from Phoenix to Pyongyang to escape the unconscionable oppression of your local HOA.
Yeah, but why would Russia care about me?
Re: VPN – Very Precarious Narrative
#267Earlier quoted context omitted.
which is Russian That's a bit like moving from Phoenix to Pyongyang to escape the unconscionable oppression of your local HOA.
Yeah, but why would Russia care about me?
Re: VPN – Very Precarious Narrative
#268Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, but why would Russia care about me?
Why would the US care about you? And that's on top of the fact that the policy and regulatory regime in Russia has (over some years and quite openly) moved towards essentially full legal interception capability of everyone's internet comms. Roskomnadzor is out there actually doing the stuff the imaginary messageboard NSA does.
Re: VPN – Very Precarious Narrative
#269Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why would the US care about you? And that's on top of the fact that the policy and regulatory regime in Russia has (over some years and quite openly) moved towards essentially full legal interception capability of everyone's internet comms. Roskomnadzor is out there actually doing the stuff the imaginary messageboard NSA does.
What mostly matters is that the US and Russia aren't exactly on speaking terms.
Re: VPN – Very Precarious Narrative
#270Earlier quoted context omitted.
What mostly matters is that the US and Russia aren't exactly on speaking terms.
Does this one end with you saying 'The Aristocrats!' because I really don't follow at all.
It's really very simple. The VM host that I'm using connects to a mainstream VPN service, which is quite popular for torrenting and such, using a server in the EU. Through that VPN tunnel, I connect with a different VPN service, which operates in someplace like Russia.
Then, through that tunnel, I connect with a third VPN service, which operates in some ~neutral country. And so on, until I'm satisfied, or the latency blows up. I'm happy with 0.5-1 second, for whatever that's worth.
After the third VPN or so, I typically connect with the Tor network. And if I'm really feeling paranoid, I add some hidden service VPS proxies, just for fun.[0] Or a homage to Kevin Mitnick,if you like.
0) https://www.ivpn.net/privacy-guides/onion-ssh-hosts-for-logi...