Earlier quoted context omitted.
States have never had separate sovereignty in international affairs.
> States have never had separate sovereignty in international affairs. And yet their separate sovereignty, allegedly restricted to “domestic” affairs, is why the US, through it's court system, allows US states to ignore US international commitments (notably, the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations) in their execution of their criminal law.
US citizens will need a visa to visit Europe starting in 2021
261–269 of 269 posts
Re: US citizens will need a visa to visit Europe starting in 2021
#262Earlier quoted context omitted.
Use state of birth, if it's encoded on the passports, and if not, require a visa from everyone until state of birth is encoded on the passports. As a point of order, US states do have citizens. As a US citizen, I'm also a citizen of the state in which I reside.
So someone born in Morocco who moved to France and became a French citizen should be denied visa free entry to the US because their citizenship by your standard is actually Moroccan.
Re: US citizens will need a visa to visit Europe starting in 2021
#263Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly that. From https://www.eulisa.europa.eu/Activities/Large-Scale-It-Syste... " ETIAS is a pre-travel authorisation system for visa exempt travellers." Video explaining the system: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=11&v=orrBJiXAcSU
Exactly. An American can still drive to Europe without an ETIAS, so it’s not a visa. Makes sense, don’t it?
An American can still drive to Europe
The logistics are a bit tricky, however.Re: US citizens will need a visa to visit Europe starting in 2021
#264Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You suggest to look at each EU country individually (just also keep in mind that there are no border controls beetween the EU countries in the Schengen Zone). In such case, should we also look at each US state individually (because they are also not uniform, e.g. some are much poorer than the others)? It's not the same. When you are born in California, your citizenship is "US". When you are born in Bulgaria, your c…
> I am European, however this comment makes me laugh. USA can literally crash EU in a couple of weeks, if they want to. It doesn't mean I need to live with fear, for God's sake, but just saying. That's maybe what the US believes (or some of the "America is special" hardliners) and if you believe it too I would say their propaganda did a good job. They can neither militarily nor economically do this, even if they wish…
Says who?
You don't need to crash a country just by throwing bombs at them. Just look at how dysfunctional the EU is.
Re: US citizens will need a visa to visit Europe starting in 2021
#265Re: US citizens will need a visa to visit Europe starting in 2021
#266Earlier quoted context omitted.
I never said EU is one country but the OP said: "It’s not as easy for a Bulgarian to go live in France". Which is false.
That is not correct. The quote is "It’s not as easy for a Bulgarian to go live in France AND claim French citizenship compared to a Californian fully moving to Texas" (emphasis added). In the interest of promoting honest discourse, please do not truncate people's statements. If a Californian "fully" moves to Texas, i.e., establishes domicile there, then they become a citizen of Texas. That is a key difference.
Re: US citizens will need a visa to visit Europe starting in 2021
#267Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just a few points: - Tit-for-tat response is a geopolitical reality. Regardless whether you think it is pre-school model or not, this is what pretty much all countries do, as it is a perfectly rational way (and sometimes even the only way) to defend your interests. By rational I am talking about the Game Theory kind of rational. :) - You suggest to look at each EU country individually (just also keep in mind that the…
> Tit-for-tat response is a geopolitical reality. It's also an evolutionarily stable strategy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionarily_stable_strategy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner%27s_dilemma
> Strategy for the iterated prisoner's dilemma
...
> The winning deterministic strategy was tit for tat, which Anatol Rapoport developed and entered into the tournament. It was the simplest of any program entered, containing only four lines of BASIC, and won the contest. The strategy is simply to cooperate on the first iteration of the game; after that, the player does what his or her opponent did on the previous move. Depending on the situation, a slightly better strategy can be "tit for tat with forgiveness". When the opponent defects, on the next move, the player sometimes cooperates anyway, with a small probability (around 1–5%). This allows for occasional recovery from getting trapped in a cycle of defections. The exact probability depends on the line-up of opponents.
Re: US citizens will need a visa to visit Europe starting in 2021
#268Re: US citizens will need a visa to visit Europe starting in 2021
#269Earlier quoted context omitted.
The EU exists because of Europeans. The US do not want the EU to be a political power. The US have had the 20th century, that great for them but it's high time for Europe to recover.
You don’t see how the Marshall Plan helped at all? That of course, being after that little skirmish of World War 2.
Peanuts in comparison to the jackpot that WWII was for the US, and it cemented their influence.