Live data from Hacker News

Where Vim Came From

twobithistory.org

261–265 of 265 posts

Re: Where Vim Came From

#261
post #148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe vim is a lot smaller, so for many cd-images it is easier to find the space to include it. The quickes way to validate this believe was to look for the Ubuntu package sizes (look at the size (installed)): https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/vim-nox https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/emacs25-nox

I’m not sure if that’s actually true...vim has a hard dependency on ‘vim-runtime’ which is actually pretty big (28mb)

Not counting system libraries, "vim-tiny" is about 2 MB: https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/vim-tiny

Re: Where Vim Came From

#263
post #206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

... which uses needs evil-mode

Evilmode is useless for long-time vim users with muscle memory. Things such as different behavior of ? or / are frustrating. Also many popular plugins (such as orgmode) interfere with evilmode. And movement between windows. And there's not even a consistent keystroke to close a window in emacs, and evilmode's mapping of q muddies the situation even further.

I'm not sure why you're telling me this. I'm just pointing out that Spacemacs is not an alternative to evil-mode, since the latter is a fundamental part of the former.

Re: Where Vim Came From

#264
post #206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Evilmode is useless for long-time vim users with muscle memory. Things such as different behavior of ? or / are frustrating. Also many popular plugins (such as orgmode) interfere with evilmode. And movement between windows. And there's not even a consistent keystroke to close a window in emacs, and evilmode's mapping of q muddies the situation even further.

I'm not sure why you're telling me this. I'm just pointing out that Spacemacs is not an alternative to evil-mode, since the latter is a fundamental part of the former.

Never mind, my comment is a bit misplaced.

Re: Where Vim Came From

#265
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The fact that the subreddit is called r/linux instead of r/gnulinux is a major turnoff to emacs users.

If your nose is so far up RMS ass then maybe that is actually representive of user bases and completely fine

Please don't do this here.
Post reply on HN