Earlier quoted context omitted.
>This is where you start going off the rails. People did buy hardware that was compatible with the operating system they do use. It is super presumptuous and weird to try this sleight-of-hand in your argument. Make new purchases more intelligently. >You are now off the rails and airborne. Excel is still largely unsupported and breaks nontrivial spreadsheets. The UI is also, IMO, a huge step backwards from Office and…
I've been using Linux as a daily driver for fifteen years. I have shot my share of trouble and the next two guys' too. It's not a good experience . It's bad . Even when things aren't breaking left, right, and sideways (which, to be clear, definitely happens less often today than five years ago, with the corollary that that breakage is usually something a mere mortal can't do too much about), it feels kinda...well, sh…
Funny, because this is exactly how I would describe windows 10.
Anyway!
> If you don't have a positive argument for using your thing instead of framing its competition negatively, few people will ever use it.
There are plenty of positive arguments. They have been repeated over and over so I won't do it again.
> It's not a good experience. It's bad.
> Because, for most people and including most developers, it is a strictly inferior good.
Citations needed. Because this seems purely your subjective opinion. I'm sure many people will share it with you, but that definitely isn't my experience and many will share my opinion too.