Earlier quoted context omitted.
Huh. That means that recordings of speeches/performances from concert halls are potentially suspicious. Know of any other instances of reverb covering things up? This is interesting!
I haven't worked extensively in voice adaptation, but I learned working in text-to-speech that adding a bit of reverb is quite effective at covering up artifacts. Something similar seems to be going on in live vocals. If you lack confidence in your own voice, adding a bit of reverb can make it sound much better. Not sure what's going on — whether the reverb jams the critical listening facilities in one's brain or som…
Lyrebird – An API to copy the voice of anyone
261–270 of 311 posts
Re: Lyrebird – An API to copy the voice of anyone
#262Re: Lyrebird – An API to copy the voice of anyone
#263Combined with Face2Face[1] live video impersonation, it is truly time to be very careful verifying videos or even live streams. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohmajJTcpNk
To my knowledge, both of these particular projects are still a ways away from being used in any practical sense, let alone succeed at deceiving anyone. You are right that we'll have to worry about this soon though. Likewise, verifying the identify of people we think we're talking to over video calls for example.
Re: Lyrebird – An API to copy the voice of anyone
#264Re: Lyrebird – An API to copy the voice of anyone
#265Earlier quoted context omitted.
Without a doubt, our concept of personal identity will be completely unreliable within a few generations. Forget about privacy--we will soon have literally no way to verify who we're talking to.
Crypto would still work, and this tech isn't going to work face-to-face.
Re: Lyrebird – An API to copy the voice of anyone
#266Re: Lyrebird – An API to copy the voice of anyone
#267Re: Lyrebird – An API to copy the voice of anyone
#268While all of these vec2speech type models are impressive, I get the feeling that most of the comments didn't listen to any of the samples. It's still distinctly robotic sounding, probably has quite a bit of garbage output that needs to be filtered manually (as many of these nets often have) and is a far cry from fooling a human.
For example, in a movie with a busy action scene involving gunfire/helicopters/storms the production audio is usually useless because there were fans and other loud machinery on the film set to create visual illusions of powerful winds and so on. In this situation the audio is either not recorded or used only as a guide track to match timing on a high-quality track recorded later in the studio. Actors hate re-recording dialog by lip-syncing in front of a screen and producers hate paying for it. This solution is already good enough to use for incidental characters in scenes that are going to be noisy anyway. I give it about 5 years before it's good enough to use in ordinary dialog scenes - not for the intimate conversation between the two Famous Actors flirting over a romantic dinner, but fine for replacing the waiter or other background characters.
Re: Lyrebird – An API to copy the voice of anyone
#269Earlier quoted context omitted.
Huh. That means that recordings of speeches/performances from concert halls are potentially suspicious. Know of any other instances of reverb covering things up? This is interesting!
> "potentially suspicious" History is now doomed. Crackly recordings are obviously fakeable. Children will listen to JFK's "We shall not go to the moon" speech, proof that the moon landings are a liberal conspiracy and all that grainy footage is just CGI with a noise filter.
Re: Lyrebird – An API to copy the voice of anyone
#270What the fuck are they talking about?