Live data from Hacker News

The same nine streaming subscriptions cost $702/year more than in 2021

honestlyranked.com

251–260 of 398 posts

Re: The same nine streaming subscriptions cost $702/year more than in 2021

#252

I find that piracy is the only sane option any more

I pay for Prime and still prefer to torrent Amazon shows. The experience is just better.

Prime's app is ridiculously bad imo. I'm not sure why that is, but everything is slower and takes more clicks and digging than similar apps on the same device. There are also significantly more ads than on Disney+ or Netflix ad tiers.

I find that Netflix and Paramount+ are the American services that offer the best app experience on my (very low-end) smart TV.

Re: The same nine streaming subscriptions cost $702/year more than in 2021

#254
post #194

From an aesthetic point of view, I am getting pretty tired of this obviously LLM generated static site content template design in 2025/2026. 98% of the time when I see one of these it's a bunch of "content" generated by Claude or similar. Quoting the site: "Written by Rashid N. Rashid N is the editor of HonestlyRanked. He reviews every figure this site publishes against its source before it goes out, and has never ac…

Also the dark theme is something not everybody likes. Especially with red-green inside. Think of color-blind people. My eyes are in pain from just trying to focus.

That's the surprising part. It's pretty obviously spit out by /frontend-design, the tells are too obvious because Claude has built me too many of these, but /frontend-design by default will give you both a dark and a light theme and make it adapt to system theme with no prompting at all, so why would someone build a lazy stock /frontend-design but override that specifically?

Re: The same nine streaming subscriptions cost $702/year more than in 2021

#255

The title kind of buries important details about the distribution of these costs and their changes. For example, Apple TV+ went from $4.99 per month to $14.99 per month, a +200% change, while YouTube Premium went from $11.99 to $15.99, a +33% change. So services like Apple TV+ are skewing this increase a lot while services like YouTube Premium have remained relatively low. Similarly, Apple TV+ starting at $4.99 per m…

I think the point is that we are no longer in the world of Netflix in 2015, where all shows are available.

Even if you watch « only » 5 shows, if they are on five different services then that means 5 subscriptions.

Or you spend time planning and organizing subscriptions.

.. or you just download them.

Re: The same nine streaming subscriptions cost $702/year more than in 2021

#256

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would streaming be the best option for you to watch a movie once? You have long been able to rent movies with just a few clicks from many sellers. Maybe Netflix is the only one where you have to subscribe for a month to watch a movie.

I picked a random film, Titanic, and supposedly it's $4 to rent on Amazon or Apple TV. A Netflix account costs $9 with ads or $20 without, so I guess it depends on whether you watch more or fewer films than that per month?

JFC, it didn't even cost $4 to rent titanic when it was new.

Re: The same nine streaming subscriptions cost $702/year more than in 2021

#257
post #221

One of the highest-value streaming subscriptions you can get is PBS Passport. You get it with a $60 donation to either a PBS TV or NPR radio station. The donation is tax-deductible and the PBS subscription is rich with high-quality content for both adults and children.

I've gotten it many years, but rarely watched it, because my login keeps "expiring" on Roku. If I don't watch it for, say, a month, I'll need to log in again. It's terribly inconvenient.

Hope they fix(ed) it.

Re: The same nine streaming subscriptions cost $702/year more than in 2021

#258

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These streaming services don't even support 4k hdr on linux, leaving people with no choice.

Well they do have a choice, and that's to switch to windows. I run linux too but I'm not going to pretend like my choice to run a niche setup means I'm entitled to pirate content because they don't 100% support it

I don't see why you'd be any less "entitled" than you would be to go outside and play in the dirt or watch birds. What difference does it make to them? They've told you they don't want you as a customer anyway, and you're not using their resources since you'd be downloading it from someone else, so your decision has literally no impact on them, and carries no moral weight at all.

Surely we are all entitled to do anything that does not affect others by default?

Re: The same nine streaming subscriptions cost $702/year more than in 2021

#259

The title kind of buries important details about the distribution of these costs and their changes. For example, Apple TV+ went from $4.99 per month to $14.99 per month, a +200% change, while YouTube Premium went from $11.99 to $15.99, a +33% change. So services like Apple TV+ are skewing this increase a lot while services like YouTube Premium have remained relatively low. Similarly, Apple TV+ starting at $4.99 per m…

The title means exactly what it says and the expanded details are nearly as close to the top of the article and as clearly presented as possible. Why does every article on HN need to find some excuse to make a complaint about the title?

Re: The same nine streaming subscriptions cost $702/year more than in 2021

#260

The title kind of buries important details about the distribution of these costs and their changes. For example, Apple TV+ went from $4.99 per month to $14.99 per month, a +200% change, while YouTube Premium went from $11.99 to $15.99, a +33% change. So services like Apple TV+ are skewing this increase a lot while services like YouTube Premium have remained relatively low. Similarly, Apple TV+ starting at $4.99 per m…

> All of this is to say that this "analysis" barely even qualifies as a valid first-pass at understanding this kind of data.

Another example: Disney+ and Hulu are available bundled together for $19.99 a month, something the site's own sources state:

https://www.macrumors.com/2025/09/23/disney-plus-price-incre...

But because it's just looking at the data in the most literal way possible it doesn't factor that in and instead says buying Disney+ and Hulu Premium would be $18.99 each.

Post reply on HN