Wikipedia cofounder Larry Sanger blocked from editing Wikipedia

Post by MichaelZuo » Fri, Jun 26, 2026, 10:53 PM UTC

ImPostingOnHN wrote: post #250

MichaelZuo wrote: post #249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you confused? You replied to me initially, I didn’t seek out one of your comments to reply to. And you still haven’t explained why you answered a comment believed to be a non-sequitor… with your own non-sequitor. Which still makes no sense. If you don’t want to answer any of the questions so far, you are free to leave.

ok, so: no consider that the reason you think my post was a non-sequitur to yours , may be because mine was discussing the topic of the thread you sought out and responded to with a non-sequitur thus, you are confused by both my post and GP ( "This doesnt make sense… ?" ), because you're ignoring the substance of their comment and the allegations

Post by ImPostingOnHN » Sat, Jun 27, 2026, 4:37 AM UTC

MichaelZuo wrote: post #251

ImPostingOnHN wrote: post #250

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ok, so: no consider that the reason you think my post was a non-sequitur to yours , may be because mine was discussing the topic of the thread you sought out and responded to with a non-sequitur thus, you are confused by both my post and GP ( "This doesnt make sense… ?" ), because you're ignoring the substance of their comment and the allegations

This just reads like gibberish. You’ve written multiple nonsensical replies in a row, so I’m not going to bother puzzling it out anymore.

Post by MichaelZuo » Sat, Jun 27, 2026, 11:34 AM UTC

ImPostingOnHN wrote: post #253

MichaelZuo wrote: post #251

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This just reads like gibberish. You’ve written multiple nonsensical replies in a row, so I’m not going to bother puzzling it out anymore.

> This doesnt make sense… ? > This doesnt seem to address... > This makes no sense. > you still haven’t explained... > still makes no sense. > This just reads like gibberish > multiple nonsensical replies It is unfortunate that you're so confused by what everybody else in this thread is saying. It is totally normal, however, that so many things don't make sense to a confused person. On the plus side, nobody else seem…

Post by yownie » Tue, Jun 30, 2026, 6:40 AM UTC

ImPostingOnHN wrote: post #253

MichaelZuo wrote: post #251

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This just reads like gibberish. You’ve written multiple nonsensical replies in a row, so I’m not going to bother puzzling it out anymore.

> This doesnt make sense… ? > This doesnt seem to address... > This makes no sense. > you still haven’t explained... > still makes no sense. > This just reads like gibberish > multiple nonsensical replies It is unfortunate that you're so confused by what everybody else in this thread is saying. It is totally normal, however, that so many things don't make sense to a confused person. On the plus side, nobody else seem…

Post by m0d0nne11 » Sat, Jul 04, 2026, 9:24 PM UTC

MichaelZuo wrote: post #198

Kim_Bruning wrote: post #150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, sure, it looks like one thing, but ... I took a quick look at what the "Wikiproject intellectual diversity" was actually monitoring. Specific articles or categories about things Mr Sanger finds interesting,right? Well, indeed: specifically it's all arbcom, admin elections, policy pages. You can check it out here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Larry_Sanger/WikiProject_... Then he canvassed people from outsi…

This doesnt make sense… ? Clearly all significant names involved with Wikipedia, including admins, have some kind of ulterior motives, to some degree above literally zero. Unless you believe in literally perfect altruism 100% of the time. The degree can vary from one to another, but that seems like a much higher bar to confidently pin down.