Live data from Hacker News

Rio de Janeiro's "homegrown" LLM appears to be a merge of an existing model

github.com

251–260 of 261 posts

Re: Rio de Janeiro's "homegrown" LLM appears to be a merge of an existing model

#251
post #208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can second this. Compared to many countries Brazil doesn't have such high taxes (I'd say that if you work remotely for a company outside of Brazil, you'll probably have much lower taxes compared to almost any other country -- working locally the difference isn't as big, but you have higher taxes in many other places). What it really lacks is access to capital (which is the real "mojo" of the US compared to the rest…

Also the bureaucracy, employee rights, etc. Incorporating and getting a functional business entity in Brazil is harder. In USA I literally do in 5min online including bank account. In Brazil they are taking out microscopes to verify your signature on the paperwork matches. And in the USA if you have one bad employee, just fire them any time. In Brazil for better or for worse nowhere near as easy. Obviously better for…

> Incorporating and getting a functional business entity in Brazil is harder

It’s still something you can do in less than a month. That’s nothing compared to the life of a functional enterprise.

For you to have to pay “years of salary” the employee must have been with you for a very long time - as in decades. Considering most companies don’t live to 2 years, the odds of it happening to you are very slim. Labor laws exist to protect the weak part against the possible abuses of the company. You must agree the harm a company can do to its employees is far greater than what an individual employee can do to a company. And this is why unions exist: because collectively is the only way the employees have teeth.

Re: Rio de Janeiro's "homegrown" LLM appears to be a merge of an existing model

#252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> you pay based on your revenue instead of your actuarial risk That's how public health works. It's the same as mortgage insurance in Brazil (where I come from), which is mandatory, and, since it's mandatory, it doesn't consider actuarial risk.

Doesn't make it right or morally virtuous.

There’s nothing virtuous in letting people die because they can’t afford medication or healthcare.

BTW, “right” and “wrong” are human constructs, so you are totally free to organise a society around the survival of the richest. It’s just not a society you’ll like living in.

Re: Rio de Janeiro's "homegrown" LLM appears to be a merge of an existing model

#253

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I live in Germany. No such thing as public hospitals. And I pay close to 1200€/month in health insurance to the public insurance company. I quick visit to the dermatologist to check for some tiny bumps that showed up in my forehead: 60€, out of pocket, because the insurer doesn't cover it.

Wow, 60 euro is cheap! Here in France it would be more like 150.

Ireland is in the same ballpark if you go private (insurance usually covers most of those €60).

If you go public, it’s free, but you’ll be in line based on the risk to your life, so it might be a long while. You really don’t want to check in to a public hospital and get an MRI right away because that means whatever you have is really, really bad.

Re: Rio de Janeiro's "homegrown" LLM appears to be a merge of an existing model

#255
post #248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh, so you are either deliberately, or ignorantly, spreading utter falsehoods. I think we're done here.

You're saying "spreading" as though I'm going around saying things to people behind your back. I'm making clear, falsifiable statements, which you've chosen to not falsify. Yours is the poor response, not mine.

It should be readily apparent to anyone paying a little bit of attention that large corporations do not pay their fair share.

Re: Rio de Janeiro's "homegrown" LLM appears to be a merge of an existing model

#256

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Import taxes in Brazil are 60%, plus something like 18% on top of the product, shipping and the aforementioned import taxes. The result is a nearly 100% tax on computers and consumer electronics. One for you, one for the government. And it's getting worse. Tariffs on computer hardware were raised only a few months ago.

Doesn't Dell, HP, and a number of others have manufacturing in Brazil under better tax regimes for the parts? I remember one of the points of the Zona Franca de Manaus was that - build a factory and enjoy tax breaks mostly for your imports. Apart from that, this is something that affects the HN crowd and almost nobody else.

For some definition of "manufacturing". More like final assembly. Brazil hasn't attempted to create its own computer technology since the military dictatorship. For example, there are no brazilian semiconductor fabs that would be even remotely competitive with the current state of the art.

Re: Rio de Janeiro's "homegrown" LLM appears to be a merge of an existing model

#257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This is very misleading. It's your comment that's misleading. I was trying to account for the numberless taxes that exist and get applied to every single transaction. You zeroed in on income taxes then stacked some deductions on top. > tax deductions Discounting deductions from the nominal tax rate doesn't change the fact those taxes are high, nor does it change the fact you max out your tax bracket at middle class…

> You zeroed in on income taxes then stacked some deductions on top. You're the one that brought up a comically inflated 70% number as if it were realistic. You can't act as if the nominal rate is the effective rate, then complain when I bring up numbers based on the effective rate. > If you're using them, it means the state failed to provide you with proper education and health services, forcing you to spend money o…

> You're the one that brought up a comically inflated 70% number as if it were realistic.

Nothing "comically inflated" about it. That's pretty much the upper bound. It's not just income taxes, we've got property taxes, vehicle taxes, financial taxes, not to mention taxes on consumption, especially fuel, electronics, telecommunications, food, clothing, medicine, you name it. Employment taxes also reduce potential salaries. The brazilian doesn't have any savings. Sum all of this up, it can definitely reach 60% to 70% of income.

> You can't act as if the nominal rate is the effective rate, then complain when I bring up numbers based on the effective rate.

You dismissed entire categories of taxes in one fell swoop then started hedging with some deductions. Come on now.

> No, it means I'm picky about my doctors.

What, SUS not good enough? Of course not.

> You seem to have ignored the tax-advantaged retirements accounts, though.

Because it's tax deferral, not tax deduction. You're still gonna get taxed. You're basically claiming you're saving money by using credit cards. Brazil has no equivalent to the american Roth IRA either.

> You just need to ask for receipts and put them in a (digital) folder.

So... Time and effort. Multiplied by every deductible transaction. Plus the cost of actually learning how to deal with all this nonsense in the first place.

I know how much my time is worth. Even if it were "five minutes tops", it would definitely be a tax. And it absolutely isn't "five minutes tops".

> Then do it.

OK. Data from OECD's Taxing Wages 2026 provides total tax as % of labor cost figures.

  Germany 49.3%
  France 47.2%
  Sweden 40.6%

  OECD average 35.1%
Brazil is not in this dataset. Add INSS + employer contributions and Brazil can definitely reach the ~34-39% range, which by itself is already comparable to or exceeds the OECD average. USA is at around ~30%.

However, Brazil actually shifts most of its taxes onto consumption. It leads the world in that particular tax burden: ~12.5% of GDP, roughly double the OECD average, ~56% of total revenue. Add that and we're in the ~49-55% range.

Meanwhile, Brazil ranks literally dead last in the world's most-taxed countries on welfare return to citizens. Literally 30th out of 30. It collects taxes at European levels and delivers developing country services. Europe has world class schools, healthcare, infrastructure. Brazil has drug gangs that dominate vast swaths of our territory and which perpetrate more homicides than active war zones. Quite the quality of life.

> Lua was created in 1993 in a lab doing research for Petrobrás.

And Reserva de Mercado was in force from 1977 to 1992. Petrobras had to follow strict rules under these restrictions, which included software acquisition. This directly drove the creation of Lua and Lua's predecessors DEL and SOL.

Lua is a direct child of the policies of the brazilian military dictatorship. Born from the constraints they imposed.

> What part of that is due to an increase in taxes?

The part where half of the price we pay is taxes. On top of the global shortage price increases.

> In fact, there's a record high number of computer hardware parts in the most recent list of products exempt of import taxes.

No. GECEX 852 (2026-02-04) actually raised taxes on 1252 IT/capital goods. What you're citing are the follow up tax exemption requests. Which only exist because of the tax hike. Which only apply to companies with actual industry projects. You and me won't see a dime out of this.

> just to name a few that you probably know about

Brazil does not have a single competitive semiconductor fab. No actual computer technology to speak of. Half a century behind China, to say nothing of the US. Electronic voting machines are commodity hardware, just assemblies of somebody else's computers with Linux and some custom software on top. Pix is the only brazilian achievement on your list that's impressive, and even that is still completely dependent on foreign technology.

> Elixir, LangFlow, Neovim

First you say that individuals doing cool things is irrelevant to the national interest. You just dismiss it all as hobby tier. Then you cite open source projects by individuals as evidence of Brazil's strength? Which is it?

Not the kind of hobby that gives you career experience? Ridiculous.

> I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu)

Linus Torvalds, 1991. Need I say more?

I'm going to say more.

The demoscene influenced the games industry. Minecraft was made by a single guy just messing around. Bought for 2.5 billion. Tim Sweeney built ZZT, became Epic games, led to Unreal Engine, also drew heavily from the home computer scene, as anyone who ever played Unreal Tournament knows. Wozniak built the Apple I to show off at the Homebrew Computer Club, a hobbyist club. Trillion dollar company. Facebook was once a literal campus dorm room project. Linus wrote git in 10 days to scratch an itch. Fabrice Bellard built ffmpeg. Python was Guido's christmas break project.

Individual computing capability is the seedbed of national computing capability. Everything is a throwaway toy joke project, until it goes into production and starts making money.

The brazilian government is not furthering the national interest. It's holding it back.

Re: Rio de Janeiro's "homegrown" LLM appears to be a merge of an existing model

#258

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Import taxes in Brazil are 60%, plus something like 18% on top of the product, shipping and the aforementioned import taxes. The result is a nearly 100% tax on computers and consumer electronics. One for you, one for the government. And it's getting worse. Tariffs on computer hardware were raised only a few months ago.

60% (II) with 18% (ICMS) on top for a total of +88% are the import tariffs for individuals buying devices for personal use, and small businesses using simplified postal/courier regimes. The tariffs for commercial importations are much lower and depend on the part. For SSDs, for example, II is around 10%. With other fees and ICMS, you're looking at around +60% total. Still high, but not nearly as high. But large busin…

> 60% (II) with 18% (ICMS) on top for a total of +88%

Nope. ICMS is calculated "por dentro". It's base / (1 - rate), not base * rate.

     Product = 100
          II =  60
             = 160

  ICMS total = 160 / (1 - 0.18)
             = 195.12

        ICMS = 195.12 - 160
             = 35.12
That's +95.12% tax. Also known as nearly 100% tax. One for me, one for the government.

> The tariffs for commercial importations are much lower and depend on the part.

Fair point, but they're sure as hell not "much" lower. As you yourself noted, they are still high, and obviously those companies are going to want to add their own margins on top.

Re: Rio de Janeiro's "homegrown" LLM appears to be a merge of an existing model

#259

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Brazil does have talent. Mauro Carvalho Chehab is a Linux kernel maintainer. Elixir was created by José Valim, a brazilian. I have also created my own programming language. What Brazil doesn't have is a history of properly rewarding talent, which often causes it to migrate elsewhere. So it's definitely surprising when any sort of technological development happens in Brazil: it implies someone who stayed managed to ge…

> extremely high taxes I always find this funny. Brazilian taxes are nowhere near what I would say “high”. I pay about twice as much out of my compensation as I would pay in Brazil, and that would be as if I did zero tax optimisation back then.

> I pay about twice as much out of my compensation as I would pay in Brazil

Brazil relies heavily on indirect taxation, not income tax.

The average Brazilian effectively pays about *41.1%* of their gross income in taxes when all major taxes are included. (https://ibpt.org.br/brasileiro-trabalha-150-dias-por-ano-ape...)

They break it down as: roughly 15.2% from income-related taxes, 3.1% from property taxes, and *22.9% from consumption taxes*.

---

And anyway, the real problem is that the burden of tax is way way higher for a brazilian than someone in the global north.

As a general rule, in Brazil only people who do qualified work can reach the (converted) 1000 USD threshold. People who spent years in university or trade school, and are either very good at their jobs or graduated in prestigious professions such as engineering, law or medicine.

Even if they were to pay no taxes, most 40-hour week professional programmers here would still earn, at the end of the day, less than a high-school diploma 20-hour worker in US. Let that sink in.

Now take into account that on average, out of those $1000, $400 becomes taxes: In practice, there are lots of qualified workers here who don't even make $8k/year after taxes...

And no, the lower living cost does NOT offset it. Imported/technology goods are disproportionately expensive relative to income since we receive in BRL but still pay the dollar price, if not higher, due to said consumption taxes.

It's nigh-impossible to have true disposable income that your average Joe or plain Jane can use to dedicate to homebrew their personal projects in Brazil. And when it happens, it tends to in software form, since software still is relatively cheap to make.

People whose income in the top 25% bracket here make less in dollars than US's bottom 25% bracket, simple as that.

This is, of course also true of many many countries, which is why you usually don't hear about the new cool tech from Nigeria, Brazil, Bangladesh, Congo, etc. The people who are qualified enough tend to leave the country for better conditions. Of course, I'm not saying it's impossible, but people get surprised, just as you can see in this thread.

Re: Rio de Janeiro's "homegrown" LLM appears to be a merge of an existing model

#260

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Doesn't make it right or morally virtuous.

There’s nothing virtuous in letting people die because they can’t afford medication or healthcare. BTW, “right” and “wrong” are human constructs, so you are totally free to organise a society around the survival of the richest. It’s just not a society you’ll like living in.

You took a false dichotomy and jumped to an absurd conclusion. It makes you seem more concerned about an ideological position than thinking the problem through.

There are other ways to properly fund universal healthcare that does not involve creating artificial taxes:

- Increase the actual income taxes.

- Policies that mandate the allocation of revenue from vice and environmental taxes (alcohol, smoking, gambling, fossil fuels) to the health system.

- Social security reform. Pensions should not be an investment, only insurance. Turn pensions into an UBI program that has a hard cap.

- Supplemental and voluntary insurance plans to work on top of the existing public network. This might be risky as it can introduce a dual-class system, but (a) it's already the reality in most countries anyway and (b) could be avoided if the system is built around a "cafe sopezzo" [0] mechanism (the priority is given to you when you use the service, but redirected to non-paying members for the months when you don't)

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caff%C3%A8_sospeso

Post reply on HN