Live data from Hacker News

WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

nytimes.com

251–260 of 260 posts

Re: WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

#251
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Let me make this clear: To hell with your historical collective guilt machine. I honestly dont care what people did before I was born. I had absolutely no decision in anything of theirs. Had no choice in any of that. Nor did I enslave or torture or murder people. My parents didnt either. Their parents didnt either. And somehow, Im responsible for shit that happened hundreds of years ago? Whatever. I dont mind helping…

[dead]

Re: WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

#252

This is the WHO announcement: https://www.who.int/news/item/17-05-2026-epidemic-of-ebola-d... This is our CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/ebola/situation-summary/index.html And yes, this is a big deal. Public health emergencies of international concern are a short list consisting of, in their entirety: swine flu ('09 to '10), polio ('14 on), ebola ('13 to '16), Zika ('16), ebola ('19 to '20), Covid ('20 to '23), monkeypox (…

Nobody is going to take you seriously if you have shown how greed and corruption led to your mistake in COVID - sponsored by China

Re: WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

#253

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These are relatively recent advances. But for the longest time wasn’t that case.

HIV has only really been known for ~40 years. And for at least 10 to 15 of those years research into treatment was limited and stigmatized as it was considered a "gay disease". The modern treatment regime was developed around 2010. That is, about 15 years. I'd argue that with the timeline of the disease that's not recent. What's become more recent is the mass availability of treatment and the significantly reduced co…

You just made me feel old. Wow 2010, 16 years already

Re: WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

#254

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Covid turned into a pandemic because it wasn't taken seriously at the start. (Looking at you, China.) Public-health experts never seemed concerned about hantavirus. They are with this. It's appropriate to take their declarations seriously. > Ebola generally requires contact to spread "Human infection occurs through close contact with the blood or secretions of infected wildlife, such as bats or non-human primates, an…

China actually took COVID extremely seriously from the start. They were snatching people from the streets and killing them. The China crematoriums were running non-stop. It was the US Administration and the Republicans that were the dipshits and turned a health situation into politics.

> They were snatching people from the streets and killing them.

Can you give more info on this? Tried googling it but couldn't find much. I remember there were very strict quarantines, but don't remember reading anything about "killing" people snatched from the street.

Re: WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

#256
post #193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

and yet they still do. by that logic move away and stop them visiting. conclusion drawn from your arguments...

> move away and stop them visiting This is a valid strategic conclusion. It would require America ceding Africa and probably the Middle East as strategic theatres to China and, to a lesser degree, Russia and maybe France. (This may be worth the cost.) It would also require trade and travel decoupling from both China and Europe, as well as from the Middle East and probably South America and Canada, too, given the tran…

The alternative being to tell your neighbour to tell their neighbour to stop defacating in the river or you'll stop paying their bills to bring the analogy closer to home...

Re: WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

#257
post #231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> With what money? There's a reason they're dependent on USAID. How much does BASIC hygiene cost it's like manners. It's education (which is more than well funded at a "throw cash at it problem". > we just dumped our excess production Well in a nutshell, yes we'd dumping quite a lot on Africa, that doesn't mean we should shore up the system with yet another western derived screw-up. At this point I'll go for the good…

Having clean water access, etc., is a little bit more than "education", in practice

Water + heat + sieve

Unless you have industrial pollutants in which case you also have someone to blame...

We didn't get this far as a species being that ignorant

Re: WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

#258
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Global fact: millions died.

Global fact most died from a related underlying disease and COVID simply hastened on the process. Actually killed from just this is way below the 1M mark globally.

Also we've now reached vitD in kids cereals and butter so you know, we know how to avoid this...

Re: WHO declares Ebola outbreak a global health emergency

#259
post #243

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> the anti-mask wackos Well thank you for your service to stupidity. The only measure of worth was actual social distancing which was quickly admonished by the pointless mask arguments as nauseum. No, there is no science good to bad to back up things which are broken by common sense, virii spread in Japan at the same rate as the west after accounting for population densities. (faster without the correction as you'd e…

> The only measure of worth was actual social distancing It's been conclusively shown that N95+ masks block the virus particles. IIRC the coherent anti-masking arguments were of the form that they were not necessary for general population, not that they did not work . If you want to point me to some research that shows masks are ineffective in eg healthcare settings, go right ahead. In my experience, anti-masking beh…

No. Not at all. The simulations were based on old data with the artificial cut off. The particles were and are much much smaller. Please don't recite rhetoric and do some reading.

And frankly I'm saddened that you're arguing for an educated by tryany and trying to make things political which are simply fact based

Post reply on HN