"The attention paid to terrorism in the U.S. is considerably out of proportion to the relative threat it presents." W O W. My jaw completely dropped when I read this sentence. Considering we've averted 40 terrorist plots since 2001 this is pretty scary somebody would actually print such a statement. Keep in mind, those 40 are the ones we actually know about as well. I'll continue to put up with the minor headaches as…
Airport Security Is Killing Us
251–260 of 262 posts
Re: Airport Security Is Killing Us
#252I wonder about the deterring effect. How many attacks do not occur because security is there. It's hard to measure, with a high risk to reward factor.
Re: Airport Security Is Killing Us
#253There is an old Proverb, "Only Our Enemies Truly Know How Many Plots We Foiled." I hate TSA as much as the next guy, but their presence and efforts could have deterred and foiled thousands of plots you and I would never hear about because they don't even know about them. Denying the reality of the potential danger airplanes can cause to major population centers, like we saw on 9/11 is foolish. Airport Security May Su…
Re: Airport Security Is Killing Us
#254Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then you just stand up and point out that TSA never caught a single terrorist in its entire history so there's no reason to believe it would have handled this incident.
> Then you just stand up and point out that TSA never caught a single terrorist ... Your conclusion doesn't follow from your premise -- you're using flawed logic. What would you think of an oncologist whose patients never contract serious, life-threatening cancer? Is he ordering unnecessary tests and procedures on people who aren't really sick, or is he catching all the cancers so early that they're never life-threat…
Since the science tells us that his methods reduce the rate of cancer (all metrics we can test to a degree), I'd think he's doing good work.
TSA, on the other hand, has been been called out by many actual security professionals for having shit practices that don't actually work. They're basically pulling a rain man scam and people like you are buying into it because you think there's no way to prove it hasn't magically stopped something we didn't even hear about. Actual professionals who don't have money invested in one conclusion or the other are saying it isn't helping anything.
Re: Airport Security Is Killing Us
#255Earlier quoted context omitted.
Terrorism is a tactic of murdering civilians in order to scare other civilians to behave like the terrorists want. Striking terrorists is nothing like that - nobody cares how they behave once they fulfill one simple condition - they don't murder anybody, don't blow up stuff and don't kidnap and behead people they consider infidels. If they stopped doing that, nobody would care what they do. It's the same as saying pu…
Are you honestly deluded enough to believe there have been no civilian casualties in the United States' war? Are you honestly too callous and/or imbecilic to think that calling this "collateral damage" changes the situation for someone who's life has been destroyed by a foreign entity? Again, I'm speechless at how deeply some have imbibed the propaganda of the war machine. Please, please recognize the terrible mistak…
[...] I pity your naïveté
Are you honestly deluded [...]
Are you honestly too callous and/or imbecilic [...]
Where's the substance? You said "I haven't the time to expound further" and then came back to spew more insults. Reasonable people read "I haven't the time" as "I haven't a valid argument but I disagree so I'll make you out to be a fool so obviously wrong that you're not worthy of a proper rebuttal". That doesn't work here.Re: Airport Security Is Killing Us
#256Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Then you just stand up and point out that TSA never caught a single terrorist ... Your conclusion doesn't follow from your premise -- you're using flawed logic. What would you think of an oncologist whose patients never contract serious, life-threatening cancer? Is he ordering unnecessary tests and procedures on people who aren't really sick, or is he catching all the cancers so early that they're never life-threat…
>What would you think of an oncologist whose patients never contract serious, life-threatening cancer? Since the science tells us that his methods reduce the rate of cancer (all metrics we can test to a degree), I'd think he's doing good work. TSA, on the other hand, has been been called out by many actual security professionals for having shit practices that don't actually work. They're basically pulling a rain man…
Yes, that's true, but (a) those "professionals" have no better logical basis than you do, and (b) this doesn't change the fact that you were using flawed logic, my only reason for posting. The fact that there haven't been any terrorist arrests at airports doesn't mean what you seem to think.
> They're basically pulling a rain man scam ...
This is counterproductive. It might be true, it might be false, but it doesn't follow from the evidence. Again, I'm not taking a position on the TSA, only the logic.
> Actual professionals who don't have money invested in one conclusion or the other are saying it isn't helping anything.
Name one who is using an argument more scientific than "they haven't caught any terrorists!" And again, this is not about whether the claim is true, this is about the basis for deciding whether it's true.
Re: Airport Security Is Killing Us
#257Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you honestly deluded enough to believe there have been no civilian casualties in the United States' war? Are you honestly too callous and/or imbecilic to think that calling this "collateral damage" changes the situation for someone who's life has been destroyed by a foreign entity? Again, I'm speechless at how deeply some have imbibed the propaganda of the war machine. Please, please recognize the terrible mistak…
[...] I pity your naïveté Are you honestly deluded [...] Are you honestly too callous and/or imbecilic [...] Where's the substance? You said "I haven't the time to expound further" and then came back to spew more insults. Reasonable people read "I haven't the time" as "I haven't a valid argument but I disagree so I'll make you out to be a fool so obviously wrong that you're not worthy of a proper rebuttal". That does…
First and foremost, there is simply no recourse for smsm42's argument, no recourse that that holds reason to a higher degree than nationalism.
Particularly,
nobody cares how they behave once they fulfill that one simple
condition - they don't murder anybody, don't blow up stuff and don't
kidnap and behead people they consider infidels.
This remark doesn't allow for American acts of war to have any degree of inaccuracy. If you take such an idea as fact, you and I shall never find agreement. While perhaps my insults betray their hasty inception, the idea is so inaccurate as to warrant it's correction being, in my mind, an act of human decency.Now, let's move to the matter at hand.
The crux of tokenadult's argument is that, above all:
Americans and other people in developed countries get to lead
civilized, advanced lives in the Twenty-First Century.
This is the element with which I find fault, and where you may find the division between myself and those who follow the causality constructed by propaganda. For there is an extreme fallacy here, one that is perpetuated endlessly and has set the tone of our generation.How, I ask, can we lead civilized lives while actively participating in war?
There is a disconnect between the technologically and socially liberated, wonderfully progressive population of Americans imagined in tokenadult's words and the utter chaos and violence unleashed in the reality of ground invasions and air strikes. The problem with tokenadult's argument is that this break in the chain of causality is a complete illusion.
Now, you may argue, how can a "civilian" be participating in a war they did not decide to enter, and was in fact prompted by a major attack?
To which I would reply, I'm not talking about the conflict in Afghanistan.
I'm talking about the drug war, and all its brutal ramifications from the international to the local. I'm talking about the return of slavery manifested in our prison economy. I'm talking about trade agreements both national and private designed to create entire populations of debtors. I'm talking about the very concept of health care that hinges on salary. There are many more.
These are all wars we fight daily, contribute to endlessly, and support in our very existence. Not only our tax dollars, but our attitudes and opinions are weapons in these wars.
tokenadult looks around and sees a peaceful utopia. I look around and see a society rampaged by violence, racism, sexism, and class warfare. This is not a future I wish for Afghanistan, or anyone at all.
And I certainly don't think we can get anyone anywhere by force.
Time's up. Now let's go write some code and get on with our lives.
Re: Airport Security Is Killing Us
#258Earlier quoted context omitted.
The issue is not the time it takes to clear security. The issue is whether it makes you feel like shit to clear it. If it doesn't make you feel like shit given how airport security works right now, I respectfully submit your shit-meter is calibrated wrong. But also, two points: 1) Your flying experience would be quite different with kids. 2) The flying experience varies very widely by airport. Often by terminal withi…
I tried to make my situation clear so as to avoid making it seem like I was commenting on other people's situations. Not everyone can easily avoid taking liquids along for example, and I certainly don't want to imply that people in other situations than mine 'invite' security hassles. But part of what I'm trying to understand is why any of the current rules "should" make me feel like shit to go through - taking a few…
> taking a few things out of my bag and removing my shoes are easy and quick
There's also taking off your belt or suspenders (and then trying to keep your pants from falling off, or risking arrest if they do), taking off your watch, putting your wallet on a belt where random people can make off with it, and having to choose between a pat-down search or standing in a machine with your arms over your head for a while, all for no particularly good reason.
Even the shoes thing is pretty ridiculous, especially given the state of cleanliness of the floors in airports, speaking as someone who distinctly recalls a time when you just wore your shoes through the metal detector, just like you still do in most countries. (Oh, and I should note that at Reagan National there are booties available at the security checkpoint so all the Congress-folk won't have to deal with the dirty floors like people at other airports.)
Back to your questions, in order:
The frustration _is_ in large part about the security theater aspect. Little things like having to throw out the water bottle that Israeli security already cleared through, the completely arbitrary and nonsensical rules about liquids, the perfunctory pat-downs whose only purpose is to be annoying so as to force people into the scanners, the ineffective scanners, and the general disproportionality of the response to the problem being solved. Basically, I would be a lot more OK with more stringent security if I felt there were a point to it, not just official ass-covering.
The other part of the frustration is that even the rules that are in place are enforced pretty arbitrarily. At some airports, in some security lanes, walking through a metal detector with a sleeping baby in a sling is OK; at others they will force you to take the baby out (waking him up) and hold in arms through the metal detector. You don't know which until you show up at the metal detector: it seems to be the TSA agent's call. Same thing for whether the 3-month-old's booties have to come off and go through the X-ray, just in case you stuck 3-4 grams of explosive in the soles or something.
And a last, most important, problem I have with all this is that I _do_ travel with kids a good bit. And my concern is that my children are learning that having to take off your clothes and be searched because someone randomly decides so is OK. The basic fact that government power is, and should be, limited and that there is such a thing as human dignity is that much harder to teach to kids who're dealing with airports on a regular basis. And _that_, of all the TSA activities, is what I despise them most: that they're in the business of making people be used to being treated like criminals.
Re: Airport Security Is Killing Us
#259Earlier quoted context omitted.
>What would you think of an oncologist whose patients never contract serious, life-threatening cancer? Since the science tells us that his methods reduce the rate of cancer (all metrics we can test to a degree), I'd think he's doing good work. TSA, on the other hand, has been been called out by many actual security professionals for having shit practices that don't actually work. They're basically pulling a rain man…
> TSA, on the other hand, has been been called out by many actual security professionals for having shit practices that don't actually work. Yes, that's true, but (a) those "professionals" have no better logical basis than you do, and (b) this doesn't change the fact that you were using flawed logic, my only reason for posting. The fact that there haven't been any terrorist arrests at airports doesn't mean what you s…
Also, there are other ways terrorists could hurt us that would be much easier to exploit than getting on a plane. Why has this never been tried? There is just no reason to believe TSA is doing anything useful. The burden of proof lies with them and their extraordinary claims that they're somehow keeping us safe with their bullshit ineffective procedures.
Re: Airport Security Is Killing Us
#260Earlier quoted context omitted.
>What would you think of an oncologist whose patients never contract serious, life-threatening cancer? Since the science tells us that his methods reduce the rate of cancer (all metrics we can test to a degree), I'd think he's doing good work. TSA, on the other hand, has been been called out by many actual security professionals for having shit practices that don't actually work. They're basically pulling a rain man…
> TSA, on the other hand, has been been called out by many actual security professionals for having shit practices that don't actually work. Yes, that's true, but (a) those "professionals" have no better logical basis than you do, and (b) this doesn't change the fact that you were using flawed logic, my only reason for posting. The fact that there haven't been any terrorist arrests at airports doesn't mean what you s…