>>> the US and its allies must maintain a decisive lead in AI technology. Governments have an essential role to play in helping maintain that lead, and in both assessing and mitigating the national security risks associated with AI models. We are ready to work with local, state, and federal representatives to assist in these tasks. How long would it take to turn a defensive mechanism into an offensive one?
In this case there is almost no distinction. Assuming the model is as powerful as claimed, someone with access to the weights could do immense damage without additional significant R&D.
Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
251–260 of 921 posts
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#252If it manages to work on my java project for an entire day without me having to say "fix FQN" 5 times a day I'll be surprised.
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#253Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anthropic has behaved the least like this of the AI companies.
They made a claim that 100% of code would be AI generated in a year, over a year ago.
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#254Expect to see lots of these in the upcoming months as the big companies scramble to keep from losing money.
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#255Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm too much of an anarchist for that. I believe what I said: > I think it would be net better for the public if they just made Mythos available to everyone.
10 Axios's within 5 days.
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#256It's messed up that Anthropic simultaneously claims to be a public benefit copro and is also picking who gets to benefit from their newly enhanced cybersecurity capabilities. It means that the economic benefit is going to the existing industry heavyweights. (And no, the Linux Foundation being in the list doesn't imply broad benefit to OSS. Linux Foundation has an agenda and will pick who benefits according to what is…
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#257It's messed up that Anthropic simultaneously claims to be a public benefit copro and is also picking who gets to benefit from their newly enhanced cybersecurity capabilities. It means that the economic benefit is going to the existing industry heavyweights. (And no, the Linux Foundation being in the list doesn't imply broad benefit to OSS. Linux Foundation has an agenda and will pick who benefits according to what is…
Releasing the model to bad actors at the same time as the major OS, browser, and security companies would be one idea. But some might consider that "messed up" too, whatever you mean by that. But in terms of acting in the public benefit, it seems consistent to work with companies that can make significant impact on users' security. The stated goal of Project Glasswing is to "secure the world's most critical software,…
Sounds like people here are advocating a return to security through obscurity which is kind of ironic.
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#258It's messed up that Anthropic simultaneously claims to be a public benefit copro and is also picking who gets to benefit from their newly enhanced cybersecurity capabilities. It means that the economic benefit is going to the existing industry heavyweights. (And no, the Linux Foundation being in the list doesn't imply broad benefit to OSS. Linux Foundation has an agenda and will pick who benefits according to what is…
Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#259Re: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era
#260Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm too much of an anarchist for that. I believe what I said: > I think it would be net better for the public if they just made Mythos available to everyone.
10 Axios's within 5 days.