Live data from Hacker News

Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)

interpret.csis.org

251–260 of 263 posts

Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)

#251
post #244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That article does not say what you (and possibly the author) think it does. > The United States on Thursday temporarily lifted sanctions on Russian oil that is currently at sea This is weird phrasing, and for a reason. Oil at sea has typically already been sold! Lifting sanctions on it does practically nothing.

"30-day waiver for countries _to buy_ sanctioned Russian oil and petroleum products currently stranded at sea" with "currently stranded at sea" being one of those things nobody can prove either way with shadow fleet.

Aha! That must be all the ample and irrefutable proof Adam Schiff has been hiding that shows Trump colluded with Putin to hack the election.

Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)

#252

The dual-use problem with Starlink is really just the most visible version of something happening across the military. Phones with civilian GPS chips are increasingly used alongside dedicated mil-spec hardware, simply because the commercial stuff is more usable and gets updated faster. The real strategic question isn't whether Starlink can be weaponized - of course it can - it's what happens when military operations…

That's why the US military got Starshield. It is run by and belongs to the military. Make sense for critical infrastructure really.

Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)

#253
post #180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“Just left Ukraine. What I saw proved to me we can’t give up on the Ukrainian people. Everyone wants this war to end, but any agreement has to protect Ukraine’s security and can’t be a giveaway to Putin. Let me tell you about my trip and why it’s important we stand with Ukraine.” - Mark Kelly Musk replied directly to that post: “You are a traitor.” Kelly fired back the next day: “Traitor? Elon, if you don’t understan…

because of the money...he puts more value on the money he can get than the interests of his adopted country

Seems like these South African tech bros have some affinity towards Russia. I don't understand it.

Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)

#254
post #244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That article does not say what you (and possibly the author) think it does. > The United States on Thursday temporarily lifted sanctions on Russian oil that is currently at sea This is weird phrasing, and for a reason. Oil at sea has typically already been sold! Lifting sanctions on it does practically nothing.

"30-day waiver for countries _to buy_ sanctioned Russian oil and petroleum products currently stranded at sea" with "currently stranded at sea" being one of those things nobody can prove either way with shadow fleet.

>with "currently stranded at sea" being one of those things nobody can prove either way with shadow fleet.

This is simply wrong. The shadow fleet ships still exist in the physical realm and can be observed using eyeballs and other pieces of equipment.

Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)

#255

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably refering to his nazi salute, and support for far-right neo-nazi groups like AfD in Germany

That's what I thought. The "Nazi salute" was just a cringy rendition of the "my heart goes out to you" thing. I can find dozens of other famous people doing something similar. And the AfD isn't a neo-Nazi group.

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck..... then we have to entertain the possibility we might be dealing with a duck.

Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)

#256
post #253

Earlier quoted context omitted.

because of the money...he puts more value on the money he can get than the interests of his adopted country

Seems like these South African tech bros have some affinity towards Russia. I don't understand it.

youll notice these tech bros from South Africa are in fact white...that, considering SA history, kind of half explains (to me) their affinity towards Russia

Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)

#257

Si vis pacem, para bellum. Just because I have a knife doesn't mean it affects the stability of my neighborhood. Even if I use my knife to kill a killer, that doesn't necessarily affect the stability of my neighborhood. It could even improve it. All in all, I would rather live in a somewhat free America than in communist China.

[dead]

Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)

#259

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably refering to his nazi salute, and support for far-right neo-nazi groups like AfD in Germany

That's what I thought. The "Nazi salute" was just a cringy rendition of the "my heart goes out to you" thing. I can find dozens of other famous people doing something similar. And the AfD isn't a neo-Nazi group.

Why defend him?

Re: Starlink militarization and its impact on global strategic stability (2023)

#260

While there is a massive US advantage in space launch, it should be used to the maximum. It's not going to last forever (while perhaps, sufficiently long that China fizzles out demographically before it's gone).

This seems like a terrible idea. Kessler syndrome is a few provocations down the road from military satellites.

As technology advances the consequences of war get worse. Asymmetrical warfare gets more effective.

We should be building and maintaining a rules-based international community predicating on peaceful resolution of disputes.

Post reply on HN