Live data from Hacker News

Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash

theverge.com

251–260 of 331 posts

Re: Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash

#252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm certain they get your video data without your consent when the agencies have a warrant. I think it's very likely that they won't necessarily require a warrant, either. Consider the Nancy Guthrie case. The owner wasn't around to give consent, and the camera didn't even have an active subscription, yet law enforcement was still able to recover video from Google's systems. The only way it could be as you say is if t…

Personally I store locally with a unifi system. Can’t they collect that footage with a warrant too?

Depends on how good your security is. They can seize your equipment but they can’t force you to provide your password.

Re: Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash

#253
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use Amcrest's AD410. I don't pay for their cloud, have my own NVR, and can access them through Wireguard if I'm out of the house.

This is the way. Do you use frigate for NVR or something else?

I have a QNAP NAS and run QVR Pro on it. Might swap over to something else on my Unraid NAS at some point but it's good enough for now.

Re: Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash

#254

I still don't understand how otherwise sensible people can have an Alexa or Google Home. Like what part of that seems like a good idea to them?

The worst thing is that a lot of people who are very smart techies have them. I've noticed they tend to have a very cynical (IMO) outlook of "well the gate was left open a long time ago, might as well embrace it and give them everything."

Re: Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash

#255

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You seem to be taking the company's words at face value and assuming good faith. I would caution against doing that.

Amazing how often people do that. Corporations have very little incentive to be truthful and often have good reason to be dishonest. I notice it particularly wrt video games, gamers are always taking studio’s messaging as gospel and not corporate comms.

Gaming companies can be pretty stupid at communications honestly.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_Battlefront_II_(2017...

Re: Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash

#256
post #95

Doesn't matter, I've come to the conclusion I'll never buy into one these networks. There's a reason "security" cameras were always on "closed circuit", there's no need give these companies money.

I've had a couple Ring cams for years. I hate the network, hate having to pay for the cloud storage, I've just been too lazy to research self-hosted alternatives. Is there solution you'd recommend that's relatively polished and easy to use?

Others have given suggestions, but I'd also like to suggest evaluating what value you are actually getting from these devices. Would your life be made vastly worse if you just, didn't have them at all? They may have some real utility for you, in which case don't let me stop you from putting the effort in. But I think it's worth a few minutes to think about whether the value you get from these devices is actually worth the effort for you.

Re: Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash

#258
post #95

Doesn't matter, I've come to the conclusion I'll never buy into one these networks. There's a reason "security" cameras were always on "closed circuit", there's no need give these companies money.

I've had a couple Ring cams for years. I hate the network, hate having to pay for the cloud storage, I've just been too lazy to research self-hosted alternatives. Is there solution you'd recommend that's relatively polished and easy to use?

Have you tried just using nothing? Can we all take a look inward and see how fear is selling us these devices we do not need?

Maybe it is just me and I have nothing left to loose, but the idea of people needing this surveillance is baffling.

Re: Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash

#259

How long until Flock is a nationally toxic brand? They're just as bad, if not worse, than Ring. Difference being they're not a consumer brand I guess, but far more pervasive in everyday life.

The more wwe talk about Flock with our friends the faster t will happen. I like just pointing them to https://deflock.org/ for a start.
Post reply on HN