Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most probably. WhatsApp is also still using the old way of accessing photos where you have to define which photos WA has access to every time you want to share newly taken photos. I’m pretty sure they do that deliberately so you get annoyed and give them blanket access to all your photos. (Which they then probably secretly analyse in the background.)
I wish apple would deprecate the old way and force apps to adopt the new photo picker.
iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA
251–260 of 352 posts
Re: iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA
#252I really wonder what the technical detail is that makes it so much harder for this feature to work when your phone is outside the EU, does anyone know?
Re: iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA
#253Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are they on the same iCloud account? I believe that's the magic needed.
Of course not, that's the whole point of having a separate corp phone ;) But why would switching headphone connections need the cloud... ah... nevermind...
Re: iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA
#254Are we learning the wrong lessons? Integrated always works better than modular components. Here, Apple is being asked to enable their versions of software for third party devices, which do not have the same hardware assumptions as Apple did. (Apple will not release the exact hardware spec for airpods anyway). This means the newer version will be designed modularly, with some tradeoffs to enable the "same" kind of acc…
But even ignoring that, I think your claim can be true while forcing Apple to be compatible is still the right thing to do, because optimizing for personal convenience and user experience only is not the best outcome if it comes at the expense of market failure due to vendor lock-in.
Re: iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA
#255Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you purchase a physical device, yes. You don't buy devices from AWS, you rent. I'm not sure what's hard about this.
I notice how you intentionally didn't respond to the other two points, interesting.
Re: iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA
#256Earlier quoted context omitted.
> were great but millions of man hours a year are burned navigating cookie banners on every website Cookie banner are not, in fact, an obligation under GDPR. All you need to do to be GDPR compliant is “not collect and sell data to partners” and call it a day. Cookie banners are a loophole that the EC conceded to an ad industry that is addicted to tracking everyone all the time.
> All you need to do to be GDPR compliant is “not collect and sell data to partners” Are you asserting that I can log IP addresses in my Apache logs? Seems like no one can give me a straight answer there.
Re: iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA
#257Does proximity pairing also mean seamless switching between iDevices? As it stands non Apple earphones need to disconnect from the currently paired device to only then connect with another. My Beats Studio pro on the other hand can control primary device and on secondary device I can prompt it to connect and it will switch.
Re: iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA
#258Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple can't perform well with audio on Apple Silicon, either. In 2025 macos is the only OS with audio cracking appearing with CPU load. Even Linux is better
Yeah, this is a regression since macOS Tahoe. Amazing that it still exists after several patch releases, is audio working not a basic test case for Apple? I’ve found it to be worst when using Xcode / simulator and having headphones on for music. sudo killall coreaudiod seems to fix it for a while.
Re: iOS 26.3 brings AirPods-like pairing to third-party devices in EU under DMA
#259Earlier quoted context omitted.
I see their point. If Apple knew they would need to expand this feature past their gear, possible they’d never have implemented. We may never know what stays unimplemented due to this. (This is a neutral take - note I do not have a personal opinion formed in this “debate”.)
> If Apple knew they would need to expand this feature past their gear, possible they’d never have implemented. And this is EXACTLY why they need to open up more core access to their devices. So someone else can innovate.
I'm not seeing an incentive structure for them to change being the only source of good workflows for their users - it's their whole thing "It just works" - regardless of if it's true in practice or not.