Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Here’s an example of irrational fear: “the expanding use of these models may pose a risk to application developers, consumers, and to US national security.” Yes, that contains a quote from the executive summary. First (perhaps a minor point), I wouldn't frame this a fear , I would call it a risk assessment . Second, it is not an irrational assessment. It seems you don't understand the reasoning, in which case disag…
> Once you read and understand these sections, the connection to the stated risks is clear. To spell it out: when an organization deploys a DeepSeek model, they are exposing themselves and their customers to higher levels of risk. Compared to what, exactly? The "frontier models" that the report compared DeepSeek to can't be "deployed" by an organization, they can only be used via a hosted API. It's an entirely differ…
1. a self-deployed open-weight LLM (such as DeepSeek)
2. a hosted LLM (such as Claude)
Do you understand the scenario?
Claim: When assessing this scenario, it is reasonable to compare risks, including both hijacking and jailbreaking attacks. Why? It is simple; both can occur! Agree? If not, why not?
I ask you discuss good faith without making unsupported claims or repeating yourself.