Live data from Hacker News

Apple takes down ICE tracking apps after pressure from DOJ

foxbusiness.com

251–260 of 645 posts

Re: Apple takes down ICE tracking apps after pressure from DOJ

#251

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you buy apple products, work for the company or own its stock then you are financially facilitating this. I don't know who you are and I don't care, I am just saying this is the basic cause and effect. Things cannot improve unless stakeholders use their levers to change or abandon the company.

I do 2/3 of those things and have no problem with what Apple is doing. There is no universal right side in this. This being a top comment here doesn't make it true.

FWIW, if you have no problem with what Apple is doing--and a lot of people might not: they might even actively cheer Apple on if they went out of their way to help ICE... not my jam, but a lot of people want to simultaneously be anti-ICE or anti-Trump and pro-Apple--then I don't think my comment becomes "untrue": the point simply would have no serious effect on you, as I guess you are simply OK being "complicit"... today https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsazo-Gs7ms.

Re: Apple takes down ICE tracking apps after pressure from DOJ

#252

Reading the comments on that Fox site is depressing. A lot of hate for Apple, but for the wrong reasons (as in, completely missing the danger of centralized app stores..).

I wouldn't make the mistake of thinking comments on a Fox article are indicative of... anything, really.

Re: Apple takes down ICE tracking apps after pressure from DOJ

#253
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which is why people going back and forth about incentives has always driven me nuts. Attempting to make assurances based on this handle we crank called "human incentive" that may map to human behavior in the expected direction, the opposite direction, or no direction at all, is madness! We don't know. Humans are unsolved. Give me guarantees, or the closest approximation. Federation, distribution, dispersion of author…

> Give me guarantees, What’s the incentive?

Exactly. As long as this isn’t enforced by laws, it won’t happen. And then there are administrations that get away with just ignoring the law.

Re: Apple takes down ICE tracking apps after pressure from DOJ

#255
post #252

Reading the comments on that Fox site is depressing. A lot of hate for Apple, but for the wrong reasons (as in, completely missing the danger of centralized app stores..).

I wouldn't make the mistake of thinking comments on a Fox article are indicative of... anything, really.

Most smell of foreign propaganda bots or unhinged political obsessives that I've seen

Re: Apple takes down ICE tracking apps after pressure from DOJ

#257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ya, the pirate bay is still online, so too innumerable similar sites once targeted by various agencies. A smallish map running on a RP plugged into tor would be very resiliant. But there is a bittorent protocol that allows for rolling updates to a torrent. That would be the best way to distribute kml files imho.

What’s this updatable BitTorrent protocol? I wished for something like this years ago as an auto-updating torrent for downloading Wikipedia with live (or daily or whatever) changes.

https://www.bittorrent.org/beps/bep_0046.html

They were called mutable torrents. A private key would allow the originator to push out updates via dhts.

Re: Apple takes down ICE tracking apps after pressure from DOJ

#258
post #203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The vast majority of the people on this planet have never touched an iphone. Android dominates basically everywhere outside north america and, interestingly, the DPRK.

Google does the same with the rest of the population, don't they? The methods are different, but the results are the same.

Except the phones that aren't useing googles app store, such as many Chinese phones and grapheneos users.

Re: Apple takes down ICE tracking apps after pressure from DOJ

#260

Google is making it so sideloading APKs on Android is no longer possible. This is one of many great reasons why that should not happen.

I agree with you, but can we stop calling installing software on the hardware you own "sideloading"?

Offline installation.
Post reply on HN