Live data from Hacker News

I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

news.ycombinator.com

251–260 of 294 posts

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#251
I’m British working in the US on an E2 visa (as an essential employee). How would you approach getting a green card? My employer is willing to support me in this.

It seems the lawyers suggested going for an EB2, but that looks set to take 3-4 years. Is there anything you’d recommend?

Thanks!

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can't comment on that but the issue here is what constitutes work and actively participating in YC doesn't even if this participation results in benefit to a company.

Participating in YC isn't work? Isn't it a startup accelerator for teams to grow their business? Isn't growing one's business work?

Work in the context of immigration means participating in the local economy. A person visiting SF to attend YC is not working for a U.S. company, they are not participating in the local economy, they’re on a business trip conducting business.

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#253
post #252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Participating in YC isn't work? Isn't it a startup accelerator for teams to grow their business? Isn't growing one's business work?

Work in the context of immigration means participating in the local economy. A person visiting SF to attend YC is not working for a U.S. company, they are not participating in the local economy, they’re on a business trip conducting business.

> A person visiting SF to attend YC is not working for a U.S. company

They very well could be. And it could be a US company with US investors (YC)

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#254

Hi Peter, Asking for someone else: is the NIW category still backlogged? If the goal is to get a green card within the STEM-OPT extension timeline of 2 years, for someone who has very high achievements that fit either NIW or EB1A categories, which of these is likely a better option? I'm hearing some rumors that NIW can happen faster these days. Thanks!

The NIW (EB2) category is still backlogged and the standard as applied by USCIS has changed significantly and I would argue now isn't much easier than the EB1A, which used to be one of the reasons to pursue an NIW. With the changing standard and the worsening backlogs, the EB1A is the much better option, although a higher standard, and probably worth aggressively pursuing.

Excellent thank you. This helps an extraordinary person in need who currently can't afford legal services.

To everyone else: I've worked with Peter before and he's the real deal, and a pleasure to work with.

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#255
post #252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Work in the context of immigration means participating in the local economy. A person visiting SF to attend YC is not working for a U.S. company, they are not participating in the local economy, they’re on a business trip conducting business.

> A person visiting SF to attend YC is not working for a U.S. company They very well could be. And it could be a US company with US investors (YC)

Sure, you can describe it that way if you want but that’s not the spirit of immigration law. A founder of a company (registered in the U.S. or overseas) visiting YC to raise money is not working in the local economy by the spirit of immigration law. A founder who registered a Delaware c-corp through stripe atlas is not working in the U.S. when they go to SF to raise money. That’s what business visas exist for.

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The O-1 is a high standard but it's less about overall achievement or standing (like the EB1A green card category) and more about meeting specific criteria, which many talented professionals and founders do. I would recommend reviewing the O-1 criteria (they're listed on USCIS's website, www.uscis.gov) and then having an immigration attorney evaluate your background. People are often surprised that they meet the O-1…

One of the qualifications is "Evidence that the beneficiary has either commanded a high salary or will command a high salary or other remuneration for services as evidenced by contracts or other reliable evidence" How does a startup founder go about proving this? They don't have quite the "high salary" and get paid in equity. What have you seen here? How do founders quialify for this part?

The clue is "other remuneration". USCIS will accept stock based compensation for founders under comparable evidence if you have raised money, i.e. your equity has a fair market value set by a professional investor in an arms-length transaction. Your total compensation will still need to objectively high compared to peers in your geographical area (supported by data).

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#259
post #37
post #9

What sort of people get O-1 visas? I assume it is people with multiple degrees and have decades of experience in a specific field? I am good at what I do, have done public speaking at major conferences on what I do but no degree and so assume that i've no chance of ever getting into the USA. Currently a UK citizen living in Ireland.

There's a list of qualifying criteria on the USCIS website. You have to satisfy at least three out of the eight or so. The issue is it's a bit subjective, a lawyer writes down how you qualify and some random government employee has to believe what the lawyer wrote. If you receive a RFE or rejection, all your dealings with USCIS will face extra scrutiny in future. So it's a bit of a gamble.

The evidentiary standard is preponderance of evidence, i.e. there is a greater than 50% chance what is claimed clears the statutory bar.

RFE's and rejections don't cause problems by themselves. A denial can cause problems if the reason for denial is fraud or misrepresentation.

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#260
post #9

What sort of people get O-1 visas? I assume it is people with multiple degrees and have decades of experience in a specific field? I am good at what I do, have done public speaking at major conferences on what I do but no degree and so assume that i've no chance of ever getting into the USA. Currently a UK citizen living in Ireland.

My dance instructor, who has won an international championship, is here on an O-1B. However, his 3 year initial eligibility is coming due, and the processing times for the 1-year extension is looking like it's going to take longer than 1-year! According to Wikipedia, Justin Beiber is here on an O visa, I wonder how his gets processed.

You can ask for 3 years again on the renewal and sometimes USCIS make the mistake of giving it to you even though they are not allowed (unless it's a new engagement) according to the statutory text
Post reply on HN