Live data from Hacker News

My experience with Claude Code after two weeks of adventures

sankalp.bearblog.dev

251–260 of 388 posts

Re: My experience with Claude Code after two weeks of adventures

#251
post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The recent Kimi-K2 supposedly works great. My own experience is that it is below sonnet and opus 4.0 on capability - but better than gemini 2.5 pro on tool calling. It's really worth trying if you don't want to spend the $100 or $200 per month on Claude Max. I love how succinct the model is. > you can use CC with any model via Anthropic should just open source Claude Code - they're in a position to become the VS Co…

I tried gemini2.5 and while it is certainly a very strong model you really notice that it was not trained to be 'agentic'/with strong initiative for tool calling. Oftentimes it would make a plan, I'd say 'go ahead' and it just replied something like 'I made a todo list we are ready to implement' or something similar lol. You really had to push it to action and the whole CC experience fell apart a bit.

I agree, Claude models are the most agentic oriented from the ones I've tried

Re: My experience with Claude Code after two weeks of adventures

#252
post #243

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I used to feel similarly. But recently started using Claude Code and it does feel a lot better than Cursor for me I'm not sure why. However, Claude does seem to know better where things are and knows not to make unnecessary changes. I still need to guide it and tell it to do things differently some times, but it feels like it's a lot more effective Personally, I also like that usually it just presents to me only one…

How can you prove you’re not a bot? I get the feeling I’ve seen a comment like this somewhere before. Tell us what you do—how, under what conditions, and in which programming languages. What exactly makes it better? Does it just search for files? Well, that’s hardly objective. So far the impression is… well, you say it only seems better. But you won’t get far with that kind of reasoning. Objectively, it now seems to…

There isn’t some sort of conspiracy here, man. Anthropic gets paid either way.

Re: My experience with Claude Code after two weeks of adventures

#253

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do tests let you understand a codebase you have not written?

this desire to understand code will be soon be seen as rather anachronistic. What's important is that you understand your tests. Let the AI generate the code. The spec and the test are your human contribution.

I understand your point of view but I think it's too "optimistic", i.e. it will not happen soon, at least not outside AI maximalists.

Re: My experience with Claude Code after two weeks of adventures

#254
post #243

Reading all these glowing reviews of Claude Code, I still get the feeling that either everyone’s been paid off or it’s just the die-hard fans of terminal windows and editors like Emacs and Vim. Using the terminal is right up their alley—it’s in their DNA. Every time I read comments saying Claude Code is far better than Cursor, I fire it up, pay for a subscription, and run it on a large, complex TypeScript codebase. F…

I used to feel similarly. But recently started using Claude Code and it does feel a lot better than Cursor for me I'm not sure why. However, Claude does seem to know better where things are and knows not to make unnecessary changes. I still need to guide it and tell it to do things differently some times, but it feels like it's a lot more effective Personally, I also like that usually it just presents to me only one…

> Personally, I also like that usually it just presents to me only one change/file at a time, so it's easier for me to review

This is interesting. I haven't used Cursor, but one of my frustrations with Claude Code is that some of the individual changes it asks me to approve are too small for me to make a decision. There are cases where I almost denied a change initially, then realized Claude's approach made sense once I saw the full change set. Conversely, there are cases where I definitely should have stopped Claude earlier.

It doesn't help that Claude usually describes its changes after it has made the full series, instead of before.

...really, what I'd like is an easy way to go back in time, wherein going back to an earlier point in the conversation also reverted the state of the code. I can and do simulate this with git to some extent, but I'd prefer it as a layer on top of git. I want to use git to track other things.

Re: My experience with Claude Code after two weeks of adventures

#255

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How can you prove you’re not a bot? I get the feeling I’ve seen a comment like this somewhere before. Tell us what you do—how, under what conditions, and in which programming languages. What exactly makes it better? Does it just search for files? Well, that’s hardly objective. So far the impression is… well, you say it only seems better. But you won’t get far with that kind of reasoning. Objectively, it now seems to…

> How can you prove you’re not a bot? I get the feeling I’ve seen a comment like this somewhere before. ...you're replying to an account that was created in 2007. A bio is listed on the profile page. Maybe you feel you've seen this comment before because it's an opinion lots of people share? Even if you do not.

[flagged]

Re: My experience with Claude Code after two weeks of adventures

#257
post #50

There must at this point be lots and lots of actual walkthroughs of people coding using Claude Code, or whatever, and producing real world apps or libraries with them right? Would be neat to have a list because this is what I want to read (or watch), rather than people just continuously telling me all this is amazing but not showing me it’s amazing.

I started using Claude code (CC) a couple weeks back and have some very positive outcomes. For clarity, I have been in the IT field since 1990, and my background is mainly infrastructure engineering (now DevOps). I don't write code professionally; I write tools as needed to accomplish tasks. That said, I understand end-to-end systems and the parts in the middle pretty well.

Here are some projects Claude has helped create:

1. Apache Airflow "DAG" (cron jobs) to automate dumping data from an on-prem PGSQL server to a cloud bucket. I have limited Python skills, but CC helped me focus on what I wanted to get done instead of worrying about code. It was an iterative process over a couple of days, but the net result is we now have a working model to easily perform on-prem to cloud data migrations. The Python code is complex with lots of edge conditions, but it is very readable and makes perfect sense.

2. Custom dashboard to correlate HAProxy server stats with run-time container (LXC) hooks. In this case, we needed to make sure some system services were running properly even if HAProxy said the container was running. To my surprise, CC immediately knew how to parse the HAProxy status output and match that with internal container processes. The net for this project is a very nice dashboard that tells us exactly if the container is up/down or some services inside the container are up/down. And, it even gives us detailed metrics to tell us if PGSQL replication is lagging too far behind the production server.

3. Billing summary for cloud provider. For this use case, we wanted to get a complete billing summary from our cloud provider - each VM, storage bucket, network connection, etc. And, for each object, we needed a full breakdown (VM with storage, network, compute pricing). It took a few days to get it done, but the result is a very, very nice tool that gives us a complete breakdown of what each resource costs. The first time I got it working 100%, we were able to easily save a few thousand $$ from our bill due to unused resources allocated long ago. And, to be clear, I knew nothing about API calls to the cloud provider to get this data much less the complexities of creating a web page to display the data.

4. Custom "DB Rebuild" web app. We run a number of DBs in in our dev/test network that need to get refreshed for testing. The DB guys don't know much about servers, containers, or specific commands to rebuild the DBs, so this tool is perfect. It provides a simple "rebuild db" button with status messages, etc. I wrote this with CC in a day or so, and the DB guys really like the workflow (easy for them). No need to Github tickets to do DB rebuilds; they can easily do it themselves.

Again, the key is focusing my energy on solving problems, not becoming a python/go/javascript expert. And, CC really helps me here. The productivity our team has achieved over the past few weeks is nothing short of amazing. We are creating tools that would require hiring expert coders to write, and giving us the ability to quickly iterate on new business ideas.

Re: My experience with Claude Code after two weeks of adventures

#258
post #201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When you say progress, I wonder at what cost. The apparatus for original thought isn't used and pushing through a problem and deriving the satisfaction of doing that doesn't happen. That leads to the wrong motivational cues. The brain is lazy and likes to take the easy route. Eventually you become merely a machine operator, which is something a lot of my colleagues are starting to do. And it's very worrying. The bias…

I agree with you both. I feel LLM kills both procrastination AND capability for original thought. But! There are some problems that are intrinsically interesting to me and others that are boring as hell but need to be solved. In 20 years of work I’ve not come up with any way to make those boring tasks psychologically _not_ so disagreeable they are close to painfull. But now the LLM can do whatever crap it does for th…

I use LLMs as a conversation partner but never let it write the code for me and this feels like I get the good parts without the bad.

Re: My experience with Claude Code after two weeks of adventures

#259

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do tests let you understand a codebase you have not written?

this desire to understand code will be soon be seen as rather anachronistic. What's important is that you understand your tests. Let the AI generate the code. The spec and the test are your human contribution.

you're describing TDD and it never turned into the panacea that was promised. I'm excited to try claude code, i even have a decent little personal project lined up for it but someone somewhere will always need to understand the code because tests are never 100% exhaustive and major flaws come up.

Re: My experience with Claude Code after two weeks of adventures

#260

One thing I'm slightly anxious about in this new LLM world is whether the prices I'm paying are sustainable. I crank the fuck out of cursor and I think we're paying like 40 bucks a month for the privilege. Is this early Uber where it was unbelievable how cheap the rides were? In 2030 am I going to have gotten dependent on ai assisted levels of productivity, be making client and customer promises based on that expecta…

I am speaking out of intuition, but I think that part will be the quickest to be optimized. The current capabilities will cost pennies in a few years. I base this on the past trajectory but also on hearing very authorized people say that there is still room for a lot of optimizations across the stack.
Post reply on HN