Live data from Hacker News

Oh Shit, Git?

ohshitgit.com

251–260 of 275 posts

Re: Oh Shit, Git?

#251
post #144

I’m pumped a search for hg+mercurial had hits in this thread. I am and will continue to be completely blown that hg lost the dvcs wars. It’s a better tool.

It's the slower tool.

I don’t mind if it is slightly slower, if that is even true anymore.

Turns out while hg clone, pull, or whatever is running, I can do other things!

Re: Oh Shit, Git?

#252

Silly comment, but: Every time I see `git reflog`, I see it as re-flog. It's possible that's even the reason I never remember the command, I subconsciously can't bring myself to think of it as "reference log". Instead, it's asking git to sell something cheaply, again .

I have that with fstab

It will always be f-stab in my head, can’t undo.

Re: Oh Shit, Git?

#254
post #245

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can have both. Make sure the whole diff is what you want it to be before invoking `add .`

Sure. I hear the pull-out method is also an effective contraceptive.

If it works for you, I'm not going to try to talk you out of it.

Re: Oh Shit, Git?

#256
post #144

I’m pumped a search for hg+mercurial had hits in this thread. I am and will continue to be completely blown that hg lost the dvcs wars. It’s a better tool.

It is the unquestioningly better tool right now. It's available, stable, battle-tested and it's actively supported. It's a case of "being the change you want to see". Just use it. Claims that it lost are counterproductive. The implicit deterrence from those statements is what is actively keeping Mercurial's adoption low. Hosting is available at least from Sourcehut and heptapod.host. I'm running a private Heptapod in…

I use it every day!

Re: Oh Shit, Git?

#257
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Bro" is the furthest thing from "gender neutral". Not sure how you could think it's gender neutral. It originated from male behavior and is definitely not gender neutral. You can address women as "bro" and they might even respond to you but they'll think you're absolutely weird.

I'm about 95% sure that if I ask my two school-age daughters if it's weird to address girls and women as "bro" or "bruh" in informal circumstances, they'll say no. Since I hear them do it with some regularity.

>> You can address women as "bro" and they might even respond to you but they'll think you're absolutely weird.

>I'm about 95% sure that if I ask my two school-age daughters if it's weird to address girls and women as "bro" or "bruh"

I'm 100% sure I said women, and not "school-age" girls, who if they weren't your daughters would probably describe you as "creep" because that's what teenage girls do. But sure, go ahead and move the goalposts anywhere you want. If citing teenage girls helps you think you're making some kind of point, then the mic is all yours.

Re: Oh Shit, Git?

#258
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Bro" is the furthest thing from "gender neutral". Not sure how you could think it's gender neutral. It originated from male behavior and is definitely not gender neutral. You can address women as "bro" and they might even respond to you but they'll think you're absolutely weird.

No, the female and non-binary people in my life both give and accept "bro" or "bruh" without complaint. I once asked one of my non-binary friends directly how they felt about "bro", "dude", etc and they consider those words to be gender neutral. They are like the word "man" now ("IDK man").

Where did I mention "non-binary people"? I specifically said women. Not a non-woman. Go call an actual Woman a "bro" and see how far you get with her.

Re: Oh Shit, Git?

#259
post #114

We should start recommending UIs as the default way to learn Git. It would solve a third of these problems and another third wouldn't even come up. If you later decide that the CLI is faster, go ahead. But first, people need to see visually how they can interact with the tree. I like fork.dev, but most clients are pretty similar at this point.

I've started recommending jj as a (git compatible) alternative to git, and one of the things I like about it is that the default action if you run `jj` with no arguments shows the relevant parts of the commit tree and where you are in it. This is a great reorientation tool, because you can see at a glance which commit you're working on right now, the branches and history associated with it, any other active branches…

Holy hell, I’ve used it for months now and had no idea.

Re: Oh Shit, Git?

#260

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm about 95% sure that if I ask my two school-age daughters if it's weird to address girls and women as "bro" or "bruh" in informal circumstances, they'll say no. Since I hear them do it with some regularity.

>> You can address women as "bro" and they might even respond to you but they'll think you're absolutely weird. >I'm about 95% sure that if I ask my two school-age daughters if it's weird to address girls and women as "bro" or "bruh" I'm 100% sure I said women , and not "school-age" girls, who if they weren't your daughters would probably describe you as "creep" because that's what teenage girls do. But sure, go ahea…

[flagged]
Post reply on HN