Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The purpose of the fine is to provide a disincentive Given the root comment's premise that the fine is "more or less than [Amazon] made from breaking said law," that the fine goes to the state rather than the harmed workforce members does not provide a disincentive nor does it right a wrong. For Amazon it is net neutral and the state gets what warehouse workers would have had. The state is the entity taking from pe…
> Given the root comment's premise This is my comment you're responding to at the root > [Me:] Where’s our “100x FAFO laws”? I wrote that comment. My point was that the fines should be larger to discourage bad behavior. You're saying that you're wanting things I want (disincentives for companies to harm, restorative justice), but you're showing opposition to my attempt to deliver those things. Or at least you've not…
There is no need for templates.
I will not color by numbers.
Writing does not attempt to deliver anything.
The purpose of a system is what it does.
Taking from a taker is not justice.