Live data from Hacker News

Windows 10 wallpaper was physically built and photographed (2015)

gmunk.com

251–260 of 291 posts

Re: Windows 10 wallpaper was physically built and photographed (2015)

#251
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gmunk was working on visual graphics for the web back in late 90s / early 2000s with Vir2L. If they wanted to, they could have easily banged out half a dozen wallpapers in an afternoon using Maya or whatever, but they chose the physical route.

This is the hilarious part about the comments. Nobody knows who GMUNK is and it shows. Dudes been knocking it out of the park for decades.

He's my all time fav digital artist, his infrared photography work is fantastic.

Re: Windows 10 wallpaper was physically built and photographed (2015)

#252
post #246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Try Linux/Fedora intead. Windows is really awful, and Macs are super limited in hardware. (It might work if you only do web dev) Fedora is literally better than both. People are just so used to repeating the linux prayer of 'debian/ubuntu/mint', that most people don't know: Debian is an outdated/old distro with limited features and lots of bugs. Fedora is up-to-date, loaded with codecs and drivers, works with Nvidia,…

Fedora favors shifting the technological overton window over shipping working software. I first tried Fedora out on the initial release which switched on Wayland by default -- this was in like 2017, or around there. I installed it, booted to the login screen, and then logging in went to a black screen which booted me back to login. I was on an Nvidia card which was unsupported and I had no idea what Wayland was, so I…

The irony is that last year, Mint didn't have a recent kernel, so you couldn't use NVIDIA on Mint.

Not sure what to recommend then.

Re: Windows 10 wallpaper was physically built and photographed (2015)

#253

This is so over-engineered, it tells you that when you have billions, you do the most whacky things. A 5-minute VFX job will yield the same results. But no, there's so much f*k you money, they had to do this.

The cost of this shoot would pale in comparison to the marketing budget.

Re: Windows 10 wallpaper was physically built and photographed (2015)

#254
post #249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

TBF, the blender version you reference was from an animation, not the first single still render. blender (frame 0): https://i.imgur.com/XIV8Hma.png original: https://i.imgur.com/GGwVibG.jpeg Also, it includes a caveat: > Unfortunately, due to the nature of volumetric rendering, I was unable to economically render the final animation at a high resolution with enough samples. So I had to resort to denoising, which sadl…

And so the remaining 20% of the work will take another 80% of effort. Classic

No, not really. Increasing the volumetric samples + bounces size is fairly simple. It's just a value in the rendering tab.

Re: Windows 10 wallpaper was physically built and photographed (2015)

#256
post #178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>you can let the world do the work for you. Reminds me of the Spaghetti Sorting algorithm. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaghetti_sort

Interesting but I am not sure I understand this: >> contact-and-removal operation takes constant time, the worst-case time complexity of the algorithm is O(n). How is the contact-and-removal operation constant time? How can that assumption ever be true? If you use a parallel processor like human vision or human feel (ie. which pressure nerve activates on the hand) it may appear constant, but if you use a computer it…

You can simplify the "human hand" to a rigid metal sheet that comes down from the top and stops on the highest object. Still constant time, but no "parallel processing" needed.

The point is that reality itself is highly parallel

Re: Windows 10 wallpaper was physically built and photographed (2015)

#257
post #82

I've been spending a lot of time on photography (though mostly w/ film cameras) during recent years, and only recently realized this is actually photographed. (It took long because I'm a long-time Linux user, so I barely seen the image.) Many people say this would've been easier with VFX, but I disagree. The image has highly convincing details that would take a long time even for highly talented VFX artists to nail.…

>you can let the world do the work for you. Reminds me of the Spaghetti Sorting algorithm. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaghetti_sort

Of course, all computation is just setting up some physical stuff in such a way that, after the laws of physics play themselves out for a while, that physical stuff will be in a new state, and you'll be able to interpret your desired result from that new state.

Re: Windows 10 wallpaper was physically built and photographed (2015)

#258
post #226
post #204

I always found that wallpaper a weird choice, being dark-depressing and uninviting to the average user.

I believe Windows 10 was the first with a dark mode built in. Maybe to compliment that?

There are ways to make a dark background that looks inviting, but this is not it. And it has enough bright highlights to make it uncomfortable when you actually like to have a dark screen in a dark environment, so it’s also not a particularly good dark-mode background.

Re: Windows 10 wallpaper was physically built and photographed (2015)

#259
I don't know if there's a name for this genre of photography (it's not exactly "abstract" since clearly things are being represented), but another example is the cover of Modest Mouse's Good News for People Who Love Bad News [0], which looks like a digital drawing or composite but was physically built and photographed by bandleader Isaac Brock.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_News_for_People_Who_Love_...

Re: Windows 10 wallpaper was physically built and photographed (2015)

#260
post #227

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a similar problem with gunshots and explosions - we want what movies have given us which is not what they actually act/sound like - so much so that live recordings of actual gunfire/explosions is often deemed "fake".

This is also the American/bald eagle problem. When people hear their actual cries, they’re often confused.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQ2uMauyBow vs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8SdqOT_no0
Post reply on HN