Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Omegle 2009-2023

omegle.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

251–260 of 1001 posts

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#251

Post by godelski »

blagie wrote: post #161
ethanbond wrote: post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also would comport with the explanation that the Internet just gets worse and worse. Will be interesting to see if kids who grew up with TikTok et al. will, as adults, view it as affectionately as we view our childhood form of the Internet. I do think there's something to be said of an overall trend toward more consumption, less production.

It's free market dynamics. There is a constant push towards things which are more addictive and make more ad click dollars. That's the opposite of better. Better is made with soul, and often for free. Google has come full circle. Early Google succeeded in part because of nonintrusive ad words, scamming over banner ads. Now, Youtube.

I'm not sure a market is free in the sense people mean by that term when the market is dominated by network effects. A free market in that sense requires competition and the ability to upset existing players. As an example, you can't upset Google search, and even having a 80B company with an LLM integrated into a 2.5T company is having a hard time displacing them. If that's still a free market then I'm pretty sure we could claim the USSR was a free market and just that Stalin's Communism LLC dominated.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#252

Post by jodrellblank »

Blahah wrote: post #103

Gives me chills, that was so heartfelt and raw. Hurt on all sides, but this is a bit like losing access to a public space because someone committed crimes there. One of the greatest things Omegle enabled is this... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhzHV9QD0Is (Harry Mack freestyling for random Omegle matches, it was a series of 90+ episodes and brought me and others so much joy during COVID)

Or this: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5poLSRa3cpHBfiJ6wQdT...

Frank Tedesco, pianist / musician meets people on Omegle, takes song requests and plays them - and for ones he doesn't know, he listens once on his phone then plays them by ear.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#254

Post by pdxandi »

Blahah wrote: post #243
amanzi wrote: post #187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He just did the 100th episode the other day and announced he wouldn't be doing any more.

The journey of those episodes is really inspiring. Practising in that environment he pushes the boundaries of so many areas of human achievement in one, and once he's better than anyone else in the world (maybe half way through the series) he then starts surpassing himself faster and faster.

I’m so glad to see Harry Mack getting love on here. It’s wild that he just shared his last episode on Friday and now the site is shutting down. Glad he already took off and found success.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#255

Post by Izkata »

woleium wrote: post #5

Back to Chatroulette then? Having not used either platform, what’s the difference?

What I got from a quick search, the order was:

* Omegle started with anonymous one-on-one text chats

* Chatroulette launched ~half a year later

* Omegle copied Chatroulette ~half a year after that

I've not used either one so I don't know if there was more to it. Does explain how I knew about Chatroulette but not this one, even though people up above were talking about how it was an original idea.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#256

Post by aaomidi »

peyton wrote: post #189
aaomidi wrote: post #140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No one is expecting anyone to be an oracle to be honest. > By that standard I cannot see how any reasonable person could justify building anything at all; This is hyperbolic, don't you think? If I were to write a new, let's say, operating system - why would this thinking block me? There's a ton of things you can create that really won't pose a moral question. Especially when we have prior art to look at.

Won’t your new operating system have security issues that other operating systems don’t? How do you propose accounting for the additional harm you’re bringing into the world?

It’s nothing that we haven’t dealt with?

Did I ever state that everything we do has to be harm free?

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#257

Post by FireBeyond »

silenced_trope wrote: post #235
yawpitch wrote: post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So you’re a fan of judges doing their jobs, but not a fan of journalists doing theirs? Tracking down and trying to talk to those your sources have accused of wrongdoing to try and get their side of the story and to get them to speak on the record is kind of literally Investigative Reporting 101, and has been for actual centuries now.

When judges do their job, you the accused have due process and legal representation. I specified my issue (aspergers) for a reason. I would need legal and competent representation if I were accused of something. We know from people that have actually consented to be in the public sphere (politicians, performers, etc) that even denying an accusation against you still leaves you a pariah with the scarlet letter, to be…

> We know from people that have actually consented to be in the public sphere (politicians, performers, etc) that even denying an accusation against you still leaves you a pariah with the scarlet letter, to be ostracized in some cases.

Your actions as the officer of a company are generally considered to be "public".

You don't have a right to privacy over your business (you certainly don't have to answer questions from a journalist either, but they're not generally invading your privacy by merely asking them).

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#258

Post by lukeholder »

wycy wrote: post #135
cristoperb wrote: post #118

I've never used Omegle myself, but I've watched all of Harry Mack's Omegle Bars videos (freestyle rapping) and they are golden. Always fun to see him matched with some random kids and brighten their day: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijVGIcVRIbk

The loss of Harry Mack’s Omegle Bars was the first thing that came to mind for me.

He was retiring the series at 100 episodes anyway, but yeah a sad day.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#259

Post by troupe »

ajsnigrutin wrote: post #82
echelon wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> As a young girl, Alice (not her real name) logged on to the popular live video chat website, Omegle, and was randomly paired with a paedophile, who coerced her into becoming a digital sex slave. Nearly 10 years later the young American is suing Omegle in a landmark case that could pave the way for a wave of lawsuits against other social platforms. This is fucked. We shouldn't have to put safety padding on everythin…

Yep. If the pedo found her at a walmart, would she sue walmart too? Weird people, pedos, criminals are everywhere.... parents somehow teach about "stranger-danger" offline but not online, and then blame platforms their kids use, even though they are too young to use them in the first place.

Probably should sue whoever manufactured the device, the ISP, and definitely whoever provided her with the device and paid for her internet access.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#260

Post by marcus_holmes »

shadowgovt wrote: post #126
peyton wrote: post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Won’t these pedophiles just move to Roblox or start trading kids’ phone numbers or something? Cut off one head and three more emerge. Can’t the answer to people breaking the laws be law enforcement?

They will. ... and Roblox has a financial vested interest in finding them, outing them to authorities, and keeping them off the site, so it'll be worth it to them to do so and to keep the site humming. Omegle's owner decided to shut it down because it wasn't worth it to them to do that work. That's all. Price not worth paying.

No, they were finding them, outing them and reporting them. As he says in the post. There were doing that work.

They're being sued by a victim for not preventing the victim from being manipulated by an abuser. The fact that the abuser was caught and convicted with Omegle's help is apparently irrelevant.

It's hard to see how Omegle could have done this differently; no crime occurred until the victim was abused, and once the abuse happened any subsequent action is irrelevant because the victim was still abused.

Roblox will have more ability to hire lawyers to win the victim's court case. That's the only difference.

Post reply on HN