Live data from Hacker News

Cooler screens

computer.rip

251–253 of 253 posts

Re: Cooler screens

#251
post #242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Given the importance of color to branding I think e-ink is a nonstarter in it's current mass-produced form.

Colour e-ink is available for retail purchase, and the colour reproduction is passable. The refresh time is big fractions of a minute, but that's OK for static displays. Obviously that misses the entire point of this parasiteware, which is advertising and tracking.

That's a good point, and tbh I was aware of color e-ink but I assumed the price difference was enough to be a non-starter for a (parasiteware) company.

Re: Cooler screens

#252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A screen+camera would actually enable insanely good insulation, compared to glass. A 4cm/1.6" PUR sheet weights next to nothing and has a thermal transmittance (aka u-value) of 0.4 W/(m²K). That's about twice as good as modern, triple glazed windows.

You could just apply a large poster on the front of the door. No need for a screen that generates heat.

But how does that sell ad space on my consumer attention spot market? And then they can't see the product they're about to buy! /s

Re: Cooler screens

#253

The reliability issues are surprising: First on some testbench, developing software, power supply, (physical) install procedures, etc. With that done, one would expect to outfit a few stores to see how they work IRL. But no: "The initial round of installations in 2018 reached 10,300 screens in 700 stores." As part of a $200 million plan to cover 2,500 stores. From testbench to fitting 10k screens across 700 stores, w…

> From testbench to fitting 10k screens across 700 stores, without intermediate testrun in a few stores?!?

People often forget that when "moving fast and breaking things", some parts are more frangible than others.

Post reply on HN