Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Polygamy is a more natural state for civilized human societies than we think it is I really don't think it is, but I also disagree with using the word "natural" in a way to argue its merit.
I too find it funny when people use the naturalistic fallacy. In my youth, I used to engage and try to retort about how brutal violence is also a more natural state. But now I just commiserate on HN. What’s funny is that I do think that “natural law” is useful for reasoning problems in that equilibrium and natural forced impact on lives (eg, leverage gravity don’t fight it unnecessarily) and they frequently the invoc…
Would you consider it fair to describe violence as a 'default' state? To avoid a positive prejudice whilst also describing the higher frequency of violence in history and in toddlers.
> And I don’t think there’s really any evidence that polygamy is a “natural state” only that some cultures practiced it and some didn’t.
Through the lens of 'default state' - was there any civilisation pre 2500 BC that didn't practice polygamy? My understanding is that the prohibition of polygamy spread through the Greco-Roman tradition, but I'd be interested in finding out whether the prohibition occurred elsewhere or earlier too.