> Being as I’m not an idiot Well, I'm afraid to say after reading this, I have to disagree. Common sense would have made me consider not posting an inflammatory tweet like that, to be perfectly honest.
Do you realize you are all reinforcing that business must come always first before personal expression? It is factual that one person was touting instruments of war, but by most comments here that’s seen as “the right” because it’s representing “business”. What you’re all saying implicitly is that the rights of a corporate employer to make money are always above the freedom to personal expression, by contract, by law…
I’m still on the fence about this, I also think there’s probably context that we don’t have.
Tagging the speaker was also needlessly antagonistic. That IMO escalated it from snarking to picking a fight.
If they were at an event paying their own way, I’d be in agreement with you - but they were there to represent the company.