Live data from Hacker News

Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)

amusingplanet.com

251–260 of 428 posts

Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)

#251
post #249

Honestly, this is true of most creative activities. Playing an instrument? Singing? Painting? Drawing? Almost everyone has some sort of creative activity they enjoy. The enjoyment comes in part from the lack of pressure. The activity doesn't have to pay the rent - at most, it's beer money. Perhaps more negatively: expecting to make a living with something that millions do for fun? Hubris. Very few really are that goo…

I think you commented on the wrong link

Yeah haha they meant to comment on the hobby link

Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)

#252

As an individual, I'd welcome no advertisements everywhere. I think ads were abused long enough. It's just a leech on the human life.

I agree to some degree. A local business that says “bakery” is fine in my eyes. It’s the crazy billboard and flashy signs that should go away.

Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)

#253

As an individual, I'd welcome no advertisements everywhere. I think ads were abused long enough. It's just a leech on the human life.

That's considered a radical stance, but I +1. Ads should just be banned anywhere in general. They concentrate power to those who already have it, because you can make more ads if you have more money. The local burger joint cannot compete against macdonals on advertising, the local soda against coca cola. It's ugly, eat attention, and interrupt. It creates business models with terrible incentives, which leads to censo…

> They concentrate power to those who already have it

Isn't ads exactly the opposite. A big company could preserve its brand even without ads, while a small company can't build a brand without ads.

But I completely agree on removing wall ads. Its ugly.

Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)

#254
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes grandparent is splitting hairs. Mural means wall, graffiti means tracing or drawing. There's probably a few taxonomies out there but they will be arbitrary and the whole point of street art is to get around gatekeepers.

ehh not really, throw ups are different from tags which are different from murals - muruals often aren’t graffiti because they require more time, which tends to require permission

Throw ups are different to tags but I still don't think that explains how graffiti is distinct from mural, unless you're trying to say all graffiti is unsanctioned, which... isn't really the case.

Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)

#255
post #37

Some additions: Stores also cannot use their full façade for advertising. Branding colors and details are OK, but logos cannot be too large (don't know the exact rule). The law is picky. Some stores cheat by having a glass façade, and using LEDs inside that glass. Like this: https://imgur.com/a/CLdUD1C Since this law was adopted, there's been an increase in full building graffiti, which is not banned. Now 10 years la…

that's one thing I love about living in Jersey City, NJ. there's a thriving street art program: https://www.jcmap.org/

Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)

#256

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's considered a radical stance, but I +1. Ads should just be banned anywhere in general. They concentrate power to those who already have it, because you can make more ads if you have more money. The local burger joint cannot compete against macdonals on advertising, the local soda against coca cola. It's ugly, eat attention, and interrupt. It creates business models with terrible incentives, which leads to censo…

> They concentrate power to those who already have it Isn't ads exactly the opposite. A big company could preserve its brand even without ads, while a small company can't build a brand without ads. But I completely agree on removing wall ads. Its ugly.

I think big companies do constantly need to remind people of their brand with ads to preserve it. That's why you see Coca-Cola ads everywhere, despite everyone already knowing who they are and what they sell.

Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)

#257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

THIS. High saturation colors are loud and tacky. Kyoto look wonderful.

I've applied a desaturation filter to a number of websites. The Register for example: body { /* A little less bloody red, eh? */ filter: saturate(33%); } (Via the Stylus CSS manager extension.) I also browse extensively on an e-ink (monochrome) tablet, and find that the lack of high-saturation colour is very welcome. I suspect that even colour-based e-ink displays, given their muted pastel palette, might also be an i…

Interesting. Stylish looks like malware tho.

Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)

#258
That is a minor thing, but I would love if people spelled our words right. The city is called "São Paulo", not "Sao Paulo", which makes for a completely different pronunciation. I get that they may not know how to type it, but anyone can copy and paste from Wikipedia.

Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)

#259

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've applied a desaturation filter to a number of websites. The Register for example: body { /* A little less bloody red, eh? */ filter: saturate(33%); } (Via the Stylus CSS manager extension.) I also browse extensively on an e-ink (monochrome) tablet, and find that the lack of high-saturation colour is very welcome. I suspect that even colour-based e-ink displays, given their muted pastel palette, might also be an i…

Interesting. Stylish looks like malware tho.

Good catch. I'd meant Stylus, though I keep getting the two confused as I'd initially relied on Stylish.

Corrected above.

Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)

#260
post #118

As an individual, I'd welcome no advertisements everywhere. I think ads were abused long enough. It's just a leech on the human life.

I am very much against advertisements in media. If a service doesn’t come with an ad-free option then I don’t subscribe at all. I am not as radical when it comes to advertisements in the cities. 100% no to billboards. But if a local restaurant wants to advertise pictures of their dishes at their location (not across the town), that’s fine with me. As long as ads are local to the business, tasteful and in limited size…

Not everyone has $$$ to spend on a subscription service and they would locked out of content. Ads are necessary to promote accessibility of content in my opinion.
Post reply on HN