Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can't imagine anyone calling Obsidian sluggish. Do you perhaps have a lot of plugins?
Open sublime text side by side, and it will be obvious.
For what it is, Obsidian is very impressive.
251–253 of 253 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can't imagine anyone calling Obsidian sluggish. Do you perhaps have a lot of plugins?
Open sublime text side by side, and it will be obvious.
For what it is, Obsidian is very impressive.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You seem to believe that companies do what's best for their users. Not sure in which world you live: companies do what seems most profitable for them (and pray that it is). Can we at least agree on the fact that it would not be that difficult (and costly) for Slack to actually expose an API allowing for third-party clients? That way I could have a lightweight CLI client and I would be fine with most users staying on…
Couple reasons: 1-An external API is a product, you have to maintain it, keep it backward compatible even when you change your internal models, monitor it, protect it against attacks, etc. So no, I do not agree that it would be easy for Slack to expose an external API for 3rd party clients. It would be at least millions worth of investment. 2-A lightweight CLI client for Slack? Let me tell you, this would have a very…
2- Don't assume too much. I use IRC from a CLI. But anyway you are just repeating your previous point, which is that you think it would cost millions.
3- Well, they would know what the third-party apps use in the API. They could also provide integrations for most popular languages, and those would send telemetry (what do you think the Google Play Services do?). For my crappy app, probably they don't need to know what I do, I am just a useless geek as you said.
4- Counter example: I was always able to connect my crappy app to my GMail account, and it did not prevent GMail from essentially taking over e-mail. But the couple hundred geeks who don't like the web frontend can use their crappy e-mail app, and everyone is happy.
> The beauty of liberal capitalism is that ultimately, at least to some extent, what is good for users is good for the company.
Respectfully, that is the most naive comment I have read today. I don't even know where to start answering that, so I'll just pass :-).
Earlier quoted context omitted.
He's right though, most people really don't care about 600 MB of RAM or whatever.
Our whole industry is a big joke technically. On the business side, though, we managed to get people used to downloading huge apps, that run slow, and are full of bugs. That's admittedly a big business achievement, but not the kind of world I want to live in. Just like people learn to completely ignore popups (and are often not even aware that a popup appears, even an important one), they learn to accept bugs, overal…