AI Generated Seinfeld runs 24/7 on Twitch

Post by kerpotgh » Fri, Feb 03, 2023, 9:11 AM UTC

rirze wrote: post #231

nsxwolf wrote: post #176

I'm curious as to why the dialogue is so bad. What AI is this using? When I ask ChatGPT to write a scene, the results are usually somewhat funny: INT. JERRY'S CAR - DAY Jerry and George are driving down the road, with Jerry behind the wheel. Jerry: (gazing at the cup holder) This car is such a piece of junk, it doesn't even have a proper cup holder. George: What are you talking about? It has a cup holder right there!…

Yes, but will ChatGPT give you another scene and will it be very different?

Post by mofreelumch » Fri, Feb 03, 2023, 10:43 AM UTC

smith7018 wrote: post #181

motoxpro wrote: post #178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought the dialog was amazing? It's generating conversations and a script for a TV show, are you expecting it to be as good as the original? It's crazy that they can carry out a conversation from start to end about a specific topic.

I wonder how much of a copyright violation this must be. I mean, they obviously fed it a lot of Seinfeld scripts for it to understand the characters and humor. I know HN likes to say "fair use" but I wonder how Hollywood's lawyers feel about that

Post by davidw » Fri, Feb 03, 2023, 2:49 PM UTC

mcbutterbunz wrote: post #204

smith7018 wrote: post #181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder how much of a copyright violation this must be. I mean, they obviously fed it a lot of Seinfeld scripts for it to understand the characters and humor. I know HN likes to say "fair use" but I wonder how Hollywood's lawyers feel about that

This is the question I have about feeding scripts to AI. If I watched a ton of Seinfeld and came up with my own idea about a script, is that a copyright violation? Whats the difference between that and an AI bot learning it? I don't think Hollywood or anyone can reasonably expect people to consume some sort of media (whether its a book, tv show, music) and not come up with their own interpretations and ideas around i…

Post by nextaccountic » Sat, Feb 04, 2023, 8:57 AM UTC

kerpotgh wrote: post #253

nextaccountic wrote: post #228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The description says it's GPT3

I find that hard to believe especially when chatGPT is spitting out straight, coherent gems. None of the stuff on that stream is coherent.

Post by timbit42 » Sat, Feb 04, 2023, 2:52 PM UTC

darepublic wrote: post #198

I like the idea but currently I don't find this funny / interesting to watch beyond a few minutes.