I'm glad you had a good experience. I had a different one. I've ran my own domain for longer than you have, and many emails have been compromised. Some are 100% from companies selling the emails to sister companies. The majority, though, is from a company itself being compromised by hackers / database access / etc. LinkedIn, Neopets, ProFlowers, TeeSpring, etc. I can go on.
Tell HN: After 10 years of experiments, custom username emails receive no spam
251–260 of 359 posts
Re: Tell HN: After 10 years of experiments, custom username emails receive no spam
#252Is the fear of "people selling your email to spammers" a modern myth, or are spam filters that good? Email databases for sale are not always for spam or malware. They are often used for tracking and cross marketing calculations. Placing a companies name in the address will signal a canary and they may likely filter your contact out of their database or at least flag it and treat it differently. I've been using email…
> A few vendors got upset that I had their name in the address A few years ago I created an account with a freemium publisher with the email address their.domain@my.domain and as soon as I logged into my account I had full unlimited access to all content. I suspect their system had a routine that detected staff accounts based on a string search for their domain.
Re: Tell HN: After 10 years of experiments, custom username emails receive no spam
#253Earlier quoted context omitted.
> A few vendors got upset that I had their name in the address A few years ago I created an account with a freemium publisher with the email address their.domain@my.domain and as soon as I logged into my account I had full unlimited access to all content. I suspect their system had a routine that detected staff accounts based on a string search for their domain.
I've seen this bug in prod while consulting. Bad regex.
But even with the most rudimentary web-dev languages you can replace the inner string match with a lowercase transform, split on @ and perform an exact string compare. Insanely simple stuff. Probably still a one-liner in any sane/productive framework.
Re: Tell HN: After 10 years of experiments, custom username emails receive no spam
#254Re: Tell HN: After 10 years of experiments, custom username emails receive no spam
#255Re: Tell HN: After 10 years of experiments, custom username emails receive no spam
#256My experience with generated one-per-contact addresses is similar. I think pretty much 100% spam came from the ones I use for Usenet.
In my case, mail destined for these addresses bypasses all anti-spam checks, so I know it's not the spam filters: there are none.
(Filtering mail destined for generated addresses is counterproductive; you often need them in situations where maximum deliverly reliability is paramount. Plus, such a system is a complete anti-spam scheme; it doesn't need to be combined with any other.
Re: Tell HN: After 10 years of experiments, custom username emails receive no spam
#257On August 8th, 2022, DigitalOcean discovered that our Mailchimp account had been compromised as part of a wider Mailchimp Security Incident. As a result, a number of DigitalOcean customer email addresses may have been viewed by an unauthorized individual.
Impact to you No customer information other than email address was impacted
Re: Tell HN: After 10 years of experiments, custom username emails receive no spam
#258Eventually I created a new email address and just used that all high priority stuff that I needed to read. All was good for a while but then a couple of companies that have my email address got hacked and I guess my info must have been sold because since then I've started receiving spam emails again. It's manageable at the moment, but I wonder if there will again come a time that I have to start over with a new email address.
Re: Tell HN: After 10 years of experiments, custom username emails receive no spam
#259I'm glad you had a good experience. I had a different one. I've ran my own domain for longer than you have, and many emails have been compromised. Some are 100% from companies selling the emails to sister companies. The majority, though, is from a company itself being compromised by hackers / database access / etc. LinkedIn, Neopets, ProFlowers, TeeSpring, etc. I can go on.
The worst offender for me is an email address I used to get a fishing license from the state fish and wildlife group. As soon as I did that, I started getting advertisements from some outfitter/prepper type places. Not sure if they bought the address or if licensee info is public in my state.
Re: Tell HN: After 10 years of experiments, custom username emails receive no spam
#260There’s also cases like Dropbox who had a data breach a few years back, and for whose associated addresses I’m receiving some spam since.