Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a lot of ways to get lung cancer too, but that doesn't stop smoking from being a powerful predictor. Prediction isn't assigning. And nobody in this comment chain said anything about banning. In fact the OP specifically said "I don't see a solution to that any time soon."
I introduced morality to demonstrate, with argument left to the reader, how the question you are trying to compel is misguided. Adjacent threads provide context for doing so.
Facebook's “see no evil” strategy
251–254 of 254 posts
Re: Facebook's “see no evil” strategy
#252Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a very odd definition of "left" floating around down there in the US. What is being called "left" in that context is nothing but neo-liberal centrist politics, and it has wanted to own political discussion in the US in some form or another for over a century. It's right of centre and frankly conservative on fundamental economics issues [i.e. where all the power is held], and could only be called "left" in the…
> Actual socialist politics are not permitted in US discourse We have multiple socialists elected to US Congress.
Re: Facebook's “see no evil” strategy
#253Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am dismissive. Because the opposing viewpoint is believing literal lies . Of course I will dismiss that. Everyone should.
Labels polarise. Criticise the behaviours while allowing the perpetrator wiggle room.