Earlier quoted context omitted.
Reddit is the least countercultural site I can imagine. It's still Top 10 in sites visited, is it not? It's the very zeitgeist of the times. Those examples weaken an otherwise good article.
Reddit is a meta site. The default subs are of course the default consensus, but you can find subs of nearly every other position under the sun.
The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram
251–260 of 471 posts
Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram
#252Earlier quoted context omitted.
There’s 40% of the population you’re missing that doesn’t participate in social media because their ideas have been banned. Sure, they might have a Facebook or a Twitter but nothing substantive happens there. They believe in things like gun rights, freedom of speech and religion, and they often go to meeting places called a “church”, which these days could be considered “counter-culture”. Their values don’t come from…
I've seen some hard to understand opinions on the web over the years, but church as counterculture really takes the cake.
You're looking for social unity? Politics isn't going to create that, no matter which side wins. We can show you a real social unity.
You're looking for security? The government's Covid response isn't going to give you that, even if they do it perfectly. We can tell you where you can find real security.
You're looking for happiness (or, more deeply, for joy)? You're not going to find it on Facebook, or at Walmart. We know where you can find it.
Now, you may think that Christianity can't actually supply any of that. But it claims that it can. And the point is, that claim is very countercultural.
Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram
#253Earlier quoted context omitted.
There’s 40% of the population you’re missing that doesn’t participate in social media because their ideas have been banned. Sure, they might have a Facebook or a Twitter but nothing substantive happens there. They believe in things like gun rights, freedom of speech and religion, and they often go to meeting places called a “church”, which these days could be considered “counter-culture”. Their values don’t come from…
There is huge amount of Christians and gin rights advocates on Twitter. The TV actually caters to them a lot . Yet also, people from coastal states are like 75% od USA population.
You mean, people who are against Prohibition?
;-)
Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram
#254Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wait till they see how easy it is to make a lookalike app :)
The apps are expected to generate limited-time QR codes with the respective country’s digital signature (just like the biometric data in your passport), so no, your suggestion won't work.
Yup
Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram
#255Earlier quoted context omitted.
A lot of qanon came from flat earth and now have moved on to vaccines and other conspiracies. I wonder what they'll be doing next year but I am sure they will find something. There is a significant part of the population who are deeply uncomfortable with the state of the world and look for an explanation that comforts them. This used to be mainly religion but it's spreading out into things like qanon. Extreme partisa…
There is a significant part of the population who are deeply uncomfortable with the state of the world and look for an explanation that comforts them. Yes. A real problem is that the US has no consensus on how society should work. It did, in, say, the 1950s. People were expected to get jobs, and work, and the spectrum of available jobs was matched, roughly, to the range of human capabilities. That was a generally sta…
And "Make america great again" was wonderful wording for that.
Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram
#256Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree those things you mentioned aren't very popular, and possibly where you are the mainstream culture is different than where I am, but I don't see any of those things as counter-culture in the sense that none of them are opposed by the dominant culture. e.g. If it came out at work that you were a member of a group that fought with foam swords, had unusual sexual preferences, or were funny atheists, you wouldn't…
I think that FSM does satisfy your stricter definition of counterculture. Like the Church of Satan, one of the stated goals is to force legal examination of whether or not "freedom of religion" actually means "freedom to practice Christianity". LARPing and kink also have some opposition by fairly mainstream religious-types. They're seen as counterculture, even if they don't define themselves that way. Sorry. Changing…
Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram
#257I agree that you have to be essentially anonymous to take part in counterculture these days. But the author claims that Discord and Reddit are examples of counterculture. I wholeheartedly disagree, these platforms are overly sanitized, moderated by the company, not the community. On Discord, people get banned for empty mass reports, and they can delete servers as they please. Reddit is valuable for driving communitie…
Further, reddit is built from the ground up to force consensus. Counterculture cannot exist on the site by definition, as anything prevalent on the site is there by consensus.
That makes no sense - consensus must exist within a counterculture for it to be definable, therefore counterculture and consensus can coexist.
Being "prevalent" has no bearing whatsoever on being a counterculture. It's entirely possible for a counterculture to have a subreddit and not be prevalent. The vast majority of content on Reddit never even touches the frontpage.
You could say that a counterculture can't exist on Reddit that runs counter to the platform's terms of service, and that might be true, but it's also conditional.
Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram
#258Earlier quoted context omitted.
What you're saying is and isn't true. One example of a countercultural movement that's been in the news recently is the DDoSecrets leaks/hacks (they get upset if you aren't clear that they're hackers). They've got a strong Twitter presence that helps them get their message out, but they conduct no "real" business on Twitter. So a counterculture can use the mainstream platforms, but they choose to do so only as a micr…
DDoSecrets targeted the most vulnerable voices in society, people banished to Gab for their political beliefs. They literally work for the liberal ruling system.
Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram
#259Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please explain how a democratic (political left) controlled Senate, House of Representatives, and Executive branch are not "left leaning", or how HR departments which have pseudo mandatory diversity training for their employees are also not "left leaning".
Please explain how our entire culture flipped so thoroughly in the last 51 days to make it the dominant culture for 350+ million people.
Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram
#260Earlier quoted context omitted.
>> From well-compensated marketing teams, to hordes of self-interested proselytizers (see: bitcoin), to propaganda teams looking to influence public opinion, mainstream dark forest sites simply shift the balance of power from the platform itself to the most motivated and well-funded members of the platform > Also, voting systems take care of a lot of this, because naked propaganda spam gets downvoted by the users. I…
Right, crowdsourced moderation works for badly done spam, poorly coded bots, etc. It does nothing for pseudo-science, "self-interested proselytizers" or PR teams. I think there's a mentality that if we just "crowdsource" something, somehow the work just goes away. It's a little like hand-waiving "the cloud" or "serverless" -- just because it's not your problem doesn't mean it disappears. It's still work that still ne…
Yeah, and this has been proven time and time again over at least the past 20 years. Crowdsourced moderation is also usually founded on the fallacy that people who are popular contributors will also be effective moderators, which isn't true.
Though certain crowdsourced features, like flagging, can definitely be moderation force-multipliers.