Live data from Hacker News

An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

old.reddit.com

251–260 of 376 posts

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#251

old.reddit.com

While it works.

And:

1. If you don't mind being constantly redirected to www by arbitrary links.

2. Having old blocked by robots.txt from search-engine indexing.

3. The likelihood of old disappearing at some point in the future.

I saw that future a couple of years ago and noped the heck out.

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#252

Are there any good alternatives to the reddit platform? I've been a user since 2006. When reddit blew up in popularity, many subs massively declined in quality as is to be expected. Niche subs, however, remained pretty great. But reddit as an organization is beyond repair at this point. Changes like this are now par for the course. Worse even, reddit is now engaged in censoring subs. The most obvious and possibly mos…

I've noticed that TD has recently stood up a reddit clone of sorts on a separate web site. If that works, it seems like a win all around, both for friends and foes.

Perhaps we will see a diaspora of such clones?

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#253
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been experiencing it either way on my phone this week. As I'm quite judicious about using "private" sessions for everything I suspect its been under a/b test. As you say, its not present on ud. or old.

Yeah, this feature being part of an A/B test makes sense. Hopefully the results of said test show enough of a drop in traffic/conversions for the variation with the 'login requirement' that they drop the idea altogether.

I wonder if this type of thing is A/B testable. I feel like the real effects of a change like this will take a very long time to see.

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#254

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> because that content can be a bit salty. AKA the fate of every site that is a collection of usergenerated content with an ad based business model. If you want to get serious about monetization then you need to actively curtail any content that is not "advertiser friendly" which in most cases means alienating your core content generators, case in point, Tumblr.

YouTube is starting to do this as well. For example they've made it so that accounts with less than 1000 subscribers can't do live streams any more. Not coincidentally, 1000 subscribers is the threshold for monetization (i.e., when ads start getting shown on all the account's videos). A lot of smaller channels are upset about it, since live streams were one of the ways they were /getting/ to 1000 subscribers in the f…

Another YT issue I personally find annoying as someone who has recorded a LOT of programming tutorials is all the garbage that pops up on the lower part of the screen whenever the viewer presses pause. A lot of times they're hitting pause because they want to read what I'm typing in the terminal.

In the past, YT allowed creators to prevent this behavior and recommended videos in general by appending a ?rel=0 to an embed or via the API. Last year, they removed that option.

It's frustrating that they claim to be explicitly trying to promote educational content, but then they degrade the experience for educational viewers, regardless of the preference of the viewer or creator.

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#255
post #208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds ass backwards, and I've been signing up for newsletters in addition to a little more HN to ween off of Reddit. Read some curated headlines in the morning, sure there's usually a "word from our sponsers", but it's a better experience overall than social media imo.

Any newsletter recommendations? I've been thinking of going down an RSS/Email&&Procmail route myself, but haven't done the research on quality sources yet.

The Download - MIT Tech Review

The Hustle - Business/Tech

Daily Programming Problems - Interview style questions that are language agnostic (mostly).

I also have language specific news letters for Java, Python and C# that are ok, but nothing special.

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#256

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It makes sense to think of Reddit as an application rather than a company. Reddit the application depends on network effects to grow, and without growth, decay will be inevitable. Facebook the company has been able to create other applications that grow, even while Facebook the application is starting a network effect-triggered death spiral. Reddit Inc. has not created any other growth applications like the Reddit ap…

> It makes sense to think of Reddit as an application rather than a company. Saying something makes sense doesn't make it make sense. Reddit is not just an application. Reddit is millions of like-minded users exchanging thoughts on a wide variety of subjects. The software or application may affect how those users interact with the other users, but it is the users at the end of the day that define what Reddit (or this…

This ignores astroturfing, abusive mods, user hostile tactics (forcing v.reddit on users and disallowing converting it to gifs - even banning a bot that did it at the website level), and a lot of other serious systemic problems with reddit's "community."

Reddit was once a community, but now it's an attempt to monetize its users - nothing more, nothing less. It's clearly already dying to anybody that isn't inside the echo chamber. It moved away from value creation years ago and is clearly in the death grip of value extraction.

I suspect it actually has a lot to do with their latest investment round 5 years ago, but this is purely speculation on my part.

https://venturebeat.com/2014/09/30/y-combinator-backers-upvo...

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nothing lasts forever. Reddit is 14 years old. They've had a good run. I think there is a general trend away from user-generated content as a business model, because that content can be a bit salty. Reddit might just be cashing out because the wave they rode has already crested.

What comes next? Don't say Discord.

Curious Cat

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#259

I deleted my Reddit account recently in an effort to curb social media. I've still been checking r/all and some favorite subreddits. Thank you Reddit for further breaking the site and making it easier to ween myself off of. Thank you HN for the addiction block contols on the account screen.

i haven't used reddit for a couple years now. I remember r/all being the worst. I just checked it now to verify. Too... soft? feminine? Not to mention the small drip of political propaganda. Maybe i outgrew the typical user demographic, but i think its just corny (I'm talking about r/all).

Too feminine is an unusual critique for Reddit. Maybe things really are changing fast.

The only social media I really like is Pinterest. It always gets ignored in these conversations and besides a few minor things, there development never seems to bother the base.

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#260
post #8

Hmm, I just checked myself, and I was able to read comment threads perfectly fine without being logged in, on both a desktop computer and a smartphone. Obviously old.reddit.com doesn't have these issues, but I'm pretty sure the session on smartphone used the new site, and that let me keep reading without any interruptions too. Either way, if Reddit does this, that's it. Not returning to the site. The internet doesn't…

I have personally been extremely bothered by the masked threads for a while now as I often browse reddit unlogged. So I can attest it is real and awful :/
Post reply on HN