Earlier quoted context omitted.
Who's been in charge for 16 years, and who just happens to be a military general and the eldest son of the previous prime minister. But hey, I said what had to be said, and see no point arguing about the formalities. I'll let HN users decide for themselves.
>Who's been in charge for 16 years, and who just happens to be a military general According to this logic, the United States was a military dictatorship for a good portion of its history. Presidents Washington, Jackson, W. Harrison, Taylor, Pierce, A. Johnson, Grant, Hayes, Garfield, Arthur, B. Harrison, and Eisenhower were all generals. Your claim is absurd.
You’re taking my words out of context. Washington didn’t rule the USA for 40 years and then get succeeded by his firstborn son.