No video download helper. Anyone got a good way of downloading video streams?
Have you tried youtube-dl( https://rg3.github.io/youtube-dl/ )?
Firefox 57.0 Released
251–260 of 836 posts
Re: Firefox 57.0 Released
#252Anyone know how the new FireFox compares on battery-life? Safari crushes Chrome on this front currently, but I'm curious how FireFox compares now.
I hope that our next priority becomes energy. Stay tuned :)
Re: Firefox 57.0 Released
#253Can one run the new version alongside a previous version? I need to access occasionally extensions unsupported in the new version: namely Scrapbook and the extension that provides maff file support.
Re: Firefox 57.0 Released
#254Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have a look here [0] for legacy extensions replacements. [0] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TFcEXMcKrwoIAECIVyBU...
It needs an entry for RamBack[0]. Before installing RamBack, FF was very frustrating and I was seriously considering chrome [0] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ramback/?src=...
Re: Firefox 57.0 Released
#255Re: Firefox 57.0 Released
#256Earlier quoted context omitted.
Try starting Firefox in safe mode in case that's some broken extension: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/troubleshoot-firefox-is...
No extensions installed. Literally just downloaded firefox.
Re: Firefox 57.0 Released
#257Just upgraded. Definitely feels snappier at first glance, what I'm most curious about however is how much the speed deteriorates the longer I use it (if at all). The older version was definitely pretty bad after a couple of days of uptime. All in all though. Nice job so far. :) Edit: I do sorta feel like the tabs are now smaller (when there is a lot of tabs open), any way to make them bigger?
Re: Firefox 57.0 Released
#258Earlier quoted context omitted.
None of the Firefox Quantum work has looked at power usage, so don't expect any changes on that front.
Well... new renderer and JS engine are faster and use less memory, which means less CPU cycles are used for the same thing and less information is stored in RAM, there are improvements for Windows and Linux hardware acceleration. This all summed-up means reduction of power consumption.
I don't know why you think 57 uses less memory than 56 for the "renderer and JS engine". I don't think it does. In fact, the data shows that it actually uses a bit more than 56, though this obviously depends on workload.
(Disclaimer: I work on the Firefox rendering engine and have done some work on the JS engine.)
Re: Firefox 57.0 Released
#259I'm loving the new FF, my missing feature is being able to open a site as a desktop app. I use chrome to make different icons/windows/apps for gmail, hn, reddit, photos, cloud9, etc. Anyone know if there is a way to have a website shortcut open in its own window and have an icon in the taskbar?
Exactly, this is the only reason why I don’t use anything other than Chrome. While I really want to switch to FF. Chrome “add to desktop” does make website almost as like a desktop app and without unnecessary tabbar and stuff. I wish firefox could do that. That being said, I don’t use any native app at all other than a terminal emulator. Just terminal + vscode + chrome.
It's a shame, because I would really like to be able to move my chat clients out of the Firefox UI.