Earlier quoted context omitted.
The "Smart" in the post you replied to stands for something else than your examples (which are absolutely valid uses cases!). We could summarize it as "needlessly Internet connected, reporting to some endpoint in the cloud outside of your control, which is now a point of failure". Indeed my dishwasher is likely more reliable, and my fridge can get more efficient with a microcontroller. But the 2017 version is likely…
I should have quoted the portion I was responding to. I was responding to "I have yet to hear any compelling reason to make these devices dependent on software."
Sonos: users must accept new privacy policy or devices may “cease to function”
251–253 of 253 posts
Re: Sonos: users must accept new privacy policy or devices may “cease to function”
#252Earlier quoted context omitted.
And they need my personal information for that because...?
Again with the unfounded statement. Where are you giving away personal info? You register the device with an email, what personal info do you think they're collecting? Do you think they can identify you because you named a speaker "living room"??
What benefit is there to me to provide any seller of consumer goods with my personal data?
Re: Sonos: users must accept new privacy policy or devices may “cease to function”
#253Anyone have another suggestion for a pair of wifi speakers that can be assigned to Left/Right to get stereo and can be network streamed to and have another device on the network with a line-in? I was about to buy 2 Play1's and a Connect to do a stereo install in a room where I don't want to run speaker cable. I had researched wackier home-built solutions and was going to give up and go for the Sonos. Now I'm once aga…
look into the squeezebox ecosystem.