Live data from Hacker News

Zuckerberg 'Admits' Meta's Layoffs Were Ineffective

eshumarneedi.com

241–246 of 246 posts

Re: Zuckerberg 'Admits' Meta's Layoffs Were Ineffective

#241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Google.com, Chrome, and Gmail we all very tasteful products. Gmail won more on storage space, but each of the products were distinctly fairly clean design for their time.

Google maps basically reinvented how people think about Internet maps

Yes, and Google purchased the technology, did not invent it.

Re: Zuckerberg 'Admits' Meta's Layoffs Were Ineffective

#243
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

it's a common missconception that engineers spend most of their time producing code based on documented requirements in jira tickets. I'd believe that a complete automation of this aspect of our industry would only be enough to provide a 10-20% boost in productivity. Still impressive, but within the range of "Our team improved our CI, build times, development process etc."

This is a bit like going back in time to the beginning of the industrial revolution and estimating the impact of a mechanisation based on comparing the speed of early mechanical looms vs. a skilled human. It takes years or decades for the automation of an artisan process to shake out, because it involves rethinking how everything around the now-automated process happens, and because the benefits involve the automatio…

If I understand correctly, there are more people employed in manufacturing today than there were a century ago. The hollowing of western manufacturing due to policy choices created a false perception that the sector was in decline globally.

Re: Zuckerberg 'Admits' Meta's Layoffs Were Ineffective

#244
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow, that sounds super easy. Why didn't you do it?

It's a weird assumption that the only thing stopping people from the ad business is the effort involved. Lots of people don't want to sell ads, particularly not with a side of societal harm, even if it would be lucrative. There are other things to value.

I certainly didn't think it was effort

Re: Zuckerberg 'Admits' Meta's Layoffs Were Ineffective

#245
post #20

Seems like a lot of CEOs overestimated the speed of AI, but also it is inevitable.

AI requires trillions of dollars of investment to keep going because it can't turn a profit and has a massive public backlash because the majority of people dislike it and distrust it. Companies have to force their employees to use it. It can only exist because of the massive amount of free knowledge it feeds on. It does not seem inevitable at all. This is the most forced-upon-us technology in history. It's only "ine…

Idk if I agree that companies force employees - some of my team did it on their own

Re: Zuckerberg 'Admits' Meta's Layoffs Were Ineffective

#246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because we don’t want to be left behind as members of the permanent underclass. Unless you own the god machine or work on improving it you don’t matter.

Why will those groups matter? Why would it need someone working to improve itself?

Just like beavers build dams - we’re working towards it because we’re programmed to. YOU on the other hand don’t have to work on it the rest will and that’s all we need. Humans have built tools since our conception this is just the next natural tool like fire.
Post reply on HN