Live data from Hacker News

I'm Eric Ries, author of "The Lean Startup" and new book "Incorruptible" – AMA

news.ycombinator.com

241–250 of 618 posts

Re: I'm Eric Ries, author of "The Lean Startup" and new book "Incorruptible" – AMA

#241
post #220
post #42

Thoughts on the modern trend of "AI tokens used" as a metric for performance, growth and efficiency by both startups and multi-national giants alike?

Vanity metrics strike again. Danger, Will Robinson!

Glad to see there are people recognizing it! Thank you!

Re: I'm Eric Ries, author of "The Lean Startup" and new book "Incorruptible" – AMA

#243

What does "Best Seller" mean in this context? Who says it's a best seller?

Thanks for asking. In fact, you can find all the evidence that it's a best seller on howisincorruptiblegoing.com

or you can look at this handy infographic: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/eries_incorruptible-new-york-...

Re: I'm Eric Ries, author of "The Lean Startup" and new book "Incorruptible" – AMA

#244
post #151

Eric - I've worked for NASA, ATT, IBM, HP, Amazon, and Google, not to mention a couple of startups that I started in between. None of them (except the startups, but they were brief) stayed true to their original mission. I haven't read your new book, but IMO, it's because the founders leave and the next leadership don't share the vision or values of the founders in the same way. After all, a company is a collaboratio…

One of the sad truths that the book tries to confront about the world we live in today: that most companies simply fail the test of succession. This does not have to be the reality that we live in. It is absolutely 100% possible to build organizations to resist gravity and even to transform organizations that have fallen into its clutches. The fact that this is rare tells you something about the incentive design and…

To be clear: yes, it’s possible, it’s not too late. Read the book.

Re: I'm Eric Ries, author of "The Lean Startup" and new book "Incorruptible" – AMA

#245
post #33

You give advice on startups, yet the two Startups mentioned raised lots of money and have not achieved any real success. Those who can do, those who can't teach?

I know you meant this comment as a criticism, but it actually raises a really interesting point of what we mean by "real success." I hope you will elaborate.

Re: I'm Eric Ries, author of "The Lean Startup" and new book "Incorruptible" – AMA

#246
post #218

Wouldn't simple (political) ponerology describe why does this happen to companies? It's the source of "hard times produce strong people, strong people produce good times..." cycle, and the observation that people who want to live easy lives embracing dark triad patterns slowly rise to the top, gaming perf stats, "playing the game", transforming the company/society underneath in the process.

that's cynical. companies aren't monoliths. there are constant struggles over priorities, resources , etc.

Re: I'm Eric Ries, author of "The Lean Startup" and new book "Incorruptible" – AMA

#247
post #81

I've noticed a lot of founders are building bigger and bigger things and still calling it MVP. Thoughts on how to focus the energy to more customer development than product development early on? Wasn't that the point? Focus on the high risk part?

I think you need the "always has been" meme.

Re: I'm Eric Ries, author of "The Lean Startup" and new book "Incorruptible" – AMA

#248
Hi Eric. In this day and age, and in the next year or two, what do you foresee as the most practical first steps for someone to work towards delivering a startup for income they can sustain themselves on?

And how has the traditional loop of validation, delivering and iterating on products, and getting your first paid customers changed since fast output is now possible with AI and technology?

Please structure this for someone with no startup experience, and such that event a child can understand. And please create a version that works for someone to begin to validate their idea right now and measure progress, and modify/iterate towards a goal of money generation for themselves or a team now and long-term. (And would you also describe then how this person can work on attracting a team for someone who has never successfully navigated choosing their own team before.) (And would you also accept my thanks, this is very kind of you)

Re: I'm Eric Ries, author of "The Lean Startup" and new book "Incorruptible" – AMA

#249
post #39

HR has been receiving a lot of positive and negative attention over the last 8 years, culminating lately with some CEOs notably eliminating the HR org entirely. Do you see HR as a positive , negative or mixed force for driving “Incorruptibility “ ?

There's a whole chapter on this. I actually hate the phrase "human resources," because of course part of the problem with our modern world is that we are treating human beings as a resource to be mined.

If people had paid more attention to the pioneering management theorist, Mary Parker Follett, who wrote more than a century ago, we wouldn't be in this mess. But of course, her work was almost entirely erased and forgotten, only rediscovered in the 1990s.

Don't worry, I have a whole chapter about this in the new book.

Re: I'm Eric Ries, author of "The Lean Startup" and new book "Incorruptible" – AMA

#250

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you think that the courage that Dario has regularly shown would be possible with a conventional "best practices" structure, I think you're kidding yourself. Is there something that happened which you don't think would have come to pass with a standard PBC/C-Corp (without the LTBT)? I'm trying to think of one, but nothing is coming to mind. I think the structure attracted many people to Anthropic (e.g. an RSP tha…

Do you think their dispute with the Department of Defense would have gone the same way? We didn't see that at OpenAI or Google. (Although it does remind me a bit of Google pulling out of China back in the day.)

Yeah, I lean towards the structure not being the cause of the outcome here (i.e. if you rotated the governance structure of Anthropic and OpenAI, I think the decisions at each would likely stay the same).

If they made that decision and it destroyed revenue, I could see an alternate timeline where a standard C-Corp + board with non-founder control may have ousted leadership. But that wasn't the situation for OpenAI or Google either, and their leadership still made a different decision.

Post reply on HN