Earlier quoted context omitted.
Any lawyers here? > wait for you to do it repeatedly until it adds up to enough for a felony instead of just a misdemeanor Isn't there a concept in the legal system where you have to mitigate damages even if you're the victim? I can't think of the example off the top of my head that Steve Lehto (consumer lawyer on YouTube gave). I'm guessing people who steal from the stores aren't able to afford a decent lawyer, but…
> why didn't you stop him after the first theft? Why did you keep letting him steal? Enforcement goes to the police. Stores can't apprehend thieves. There is a lot of training for store employees to not try to engage the thieves because some can behave erratically and dangerously when they feel like they're caught. You can tell someone they need to stop and pay for merchandise, but if they choose to keep walking ther…
The stores can also make a police report after the first theft, but the stores are choosing not to.
The stores are choosing not to mitigate their damages, something that the courts frown upon in my limited knowledge.
I understand that might be a civil aspect (mitigation) versus a criminal aspect, but perhaps someone who has been to law school and studied the law, might be able shed some light.