The article provides zero evidence for this claim except "our low-volume (by their own measure) marketing campaign gets marked as spam by gmail".
We have a 99% email reputation, but Gmail disagrees
241–250 of 325 posts
Re: We have a 99% email reputation, but Gmail disagrees
#242Good?
Re: We have a 99% email reputation, but Gmail disagrees
#243Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t know if this is true with Font Awesome, but more and more companies are spamming my inbox despite disabling any promotional emails in their settings. So, I mark any unwanted email as spam in Gmail immediately, and even leave bad reviews. Having my email address is not the same as having my consent. Stop trying to roofie us with malicious EULAs.
Are you an entrepreneur or an employee? Do you know how exceedingly hard it is to grow a business and how shameless you have to be in the face of adversity to make it work? It sucks. You have to do this stuff to get a customer relationship. The thing Apple and Google get for free and try so hard to snip you out of. Maybe it wouldn't be so bad if we regulated market monopolies and caused them to break up. More money t…
Re: We have a 99% email reputation, but Gmail disagrees
#244How do you get email addresses? Do people freely and explicitly choose to sign up to your mailing list, or is it baggage that you're forcing on them without their consent? I notice that when I go to https://fontawesome.com/ and click "Start for Free", I'm asked for my email address. This isn't necessary for me to use the icons. I just need a page that tells me to add the necessary tags for cdnjs [0]. I think your pro…
> This isn't necessary for me to use the icons. True, but all the information about non-kit deployments is available lower on the page.
The solution isn't a legalese CYA "but there's an alternative", it's to only sign up people who want to hear from you.
Re: We have a 99% email reputation, but Gmail disagrees
#245Re: We have a 99% email reputation, but Gmail disagrees
#246Re: We have a 99% email reputation, but Gmail disagrees
#247Earlier quoted context omitted.
Complete assumption on your part.
It was a question with an assumed answer which I think is pretty likely. It wasn’t presented as fact. I think at this point it’s pretty reasonable to assume the worst of email marketers, and I don’t care if you think otherwise :)
Re: We have a 99% email reputation, but Gmail disagrees
#248Earlier quoted context omitted.
I remember there was a thread some years back with an article complaining that you get emails immediately on sign up, but that it can take up to 10 days to stop receiving emails when you unsubscribe. One spammer said they could use the same servers for both but when you unsubscribe you have immediately signaled that you are now losing him money. So he uses the slowest cheapest part of the stack for removal. He will n…
I have done the opposite We had a million people enter their email over the last decade We haven’t messaged a single one. Now we plan to start sending out a newsletter. For many, they may have forgotten downloading the app, but they might still appreciate it. If not - they can u subscribe.
Re: We have a 99% email reputation, but Gmail disagrees
#249Re: We have a 99% email reputation, but Gmail disagrees
#250How do you get email addresses? Do people freely and explicitly choose to sign up to your mailing list, or is it baggage that you're forcing on them without their consent? I notice that when I go to https://fontawesome.com/ and click "Start for Free", I'm asked for my email address. This isn't necessary for me to use the icons. I just need a page that tells me to add the necessary tags for cdnjs [0]. I think your pro…
Fun quote from the OP: > But here’s the part that really gets us. At our CORE, our instinct is to only email folks when we actually have something fun to share. A big release, something we’re excited about, news worth your time. I would prefer not to give my email address to a company that thinks that this should give them a good email reputation. If you email me because you are excited and I’m not, I probably think…